Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

[S Moonesamy <[e-mail]>]

Hi Adam,
At 11:56 25-05-2016, Adam Roach wrote:
>Yes. I would offer up the DPRK as an existence proof of a place that 
>the IAOC should unequivocally exclude from consideration. With that 
>extreme example as an anchor, the question is where the line between 
>"acceptable" and "unacceptable" is drawn.
>
>It would be ridiculous to hold this conversation with an assumed 
>principle that every country on the face of the planet is an 
>acceptable destination.

There is a meeting survey at 
https://iaoc.ietf.org/documents/Venue-Preference-Survey-2014.pdf  The 
country mentioned above is not listed as a venue preference.  There 
was a survey in 2010 ( 
https://iaoc.ietf.org/documents/Meetings-Venue-Preference-Survey-Aug2010.pdf 
).  A comment on Page 36 is related to this thread.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy