Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

Michal Krsek <michal@krsek.cz> Sat, 21 May 2016 19:23 UTC

Return-Path: <michal@krsek.cz>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C54812D120 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 May 2016 12:23:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=krsek-cz.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id laOc29rDfx_L for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 May 2016 12:23:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BBF412D0F9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 May 2016 12:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id z87so822802wmh.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 May 2016 12:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=krsek-cz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=buZ9pl7E1/kVKJY4Z0Qd8oWaTDWmFhDciyP18M4NZbQ=; b=ETBojGC7WU8LBhEmYyL3w2Zvd8ji0m+pDUsalJdvktgejkBNtxIaWXDpcvAaByvqUy Z08+9SAlm6cbGt01UyfW0NEvq9nXH0qOae7pr50y/CaKHTdmD3IrejwjVMVZLxTW6tgN ABL+hVrfeo6oKRRO3hOcRWY2TrNKII+slOzDU5oSbjja5YHwvZBsYjmP7qsFp2JtdB8q tlTC8LGastlZ6zim4ozwXb+klb3t/xtCi5EqFNMGx0zNacgb80WBZyKxRpxMFivDjsYs P0dKK8zv3x2QwYleCDqMx0H0yqpb+yQ3VIFAYG+2PZHTg7Q2v5NmG0BZW6lwOPY3k9VX 7Pkw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=buZ9pl7E1/kVKJY4Z0Qd8oWaTDWmFhDciyP18M4NZbQ=; b=d5KVpQH5Rw2q3sWjlNhGvMvkAnPI0QcB8Gs0EkcdThRGpxNgdF6G4oRULxJZ+xrJ+H JwE2psQ/YHp8k6YKrDrBU3V9ZQewsbjLnx6vQ/malejJEZa4NqtgzscKKlSYuDRCWHWh RCA+UPfD3EK5odlwqPFoXofRaccsItF68mfjsW2w6AER23jF3H4N2nREoiU8k93tlw7n XvAjT2JAlANpYX7ECYXT2v2ryXsL8PfRl1OIt0X5WRjvJaS+obBCFTlKZAqTNqAMh8Fe kgUcAKYhtc3wS6TzPu7SKLGNXxGRFNV+TlYohEnXU0U35mF3EBS7P4BQ3iA0KS62fiid iQ5Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVofK8iI/hoiEwYO2/DpL1MY5W5aaJk4BA+Ih7vCOL/X/4AD0B0I3fNc03MUJ8pbA==
X-Received: by 10.194.184.169 with SMTP id ev9mr8994621wjc.27.1463858620265; Sat, 21 May 2016 12:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.100.104] (ip-89-102-255-104.net.upcbroadband.cz. [89.102.255.104]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w10sm25460495wjk.18.2016.05.21.12.23.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 21 May 2016 12:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
From: Michal Krsek <michal@krsek.cz>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (13F69)
In-Reply-To: <5740A90E.2030200@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 21:23:37 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EC9B10DE-FB84-48EC-BEDE-2C228D8FADEB@krsek.cz>
References: <20160517181436.24852.58610.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <3945cc1f-3e99-0fcb-e983-ed2e46fa871c@nostrum.com> <CA+9kkMAWFQDrT6WqTGz=6LcDiBkg+iuLEuSzeSqfZA4-J-tvZg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMGpKFiA78iQDFa5xaM0r0q_3LfLO_JKxaWJ9CBUTeaLg@mail.gmail.com> <C5B9F952-FEFC-4B73-9AC6-E050F59A74CB@consulintel.es> <5740A90E.2030200@gmail.com>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Vrmy6rc9U9oEp1LhqymZ-zbWCMA>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 19:23:44 -0000

Hello Melinda,

> On 21. 5. 2016, at 20:29, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/21/16 10:14 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>> What about announcing venues and cancelling because whatever
>> circumstances?
> 
> Please don't do the slippery slope thing.  Seriously.
> This is about a specific circumstance.
> 
> Also, understand that you're asking that GLBT people accept
> different conditions for participating in an IETF meeting.  I
> strongly agree that our top priority is, and has to remain,
> getting work done.  But, for better or for worse, a lot of
> participants bring their family members, and there are some
> basic questions here about equal and unequal treatment, aside
> from the potential safety issues.

so do we need a discussion about ability of getting visa for specific nations before each meeting to be held in USA?

We as community need to weigh all conditions for the meeting, but I agree with Jordi statement - the meeting is for making the work done.

And I'd like to see focus of the community shifted from "hey this country has rules for XXXX and this is not acceptable for community YYYY" to making a virtual presence more productive. 

Please do not forget for those of us who simply can't afford to travel worldwide three times for year.

Michal