Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com> Mon, 23 May 2016 03:11 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A4F12D614 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 May 2016 20:11:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V-QewtHHrCUi for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 May 2016 20:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C16012D60E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 May 2016 20:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=843; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1463973084; x=1465182684; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=eZ+HNC5UxbKJVcBUHREJJFpv1jrYxDMoZy65wSZPPiw=; b=cbCCAYgufxZ4pjix8tvsHA9nZu/kkwxTB4+1GGmjt65kd+aO7SV3mrd5 xjbAs0muybkZbep40kn48Yt6YYrzLrdDdqgz83UaXxCQDUvNEfCMCSztx m6+RwZYS6RFvDmVo2hNqw8aqc15NUjw6ltpzMLxMrEEsKyjQoc9HWgGMG k=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,353,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="276494280"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 May 2016 03:11:24 +0000
Received: from mcast-linux1.cisco.com (mcast-linux1.cisco.com [172.27.244.121]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u4N3BNCL009260 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 23 May 2016 03:11:23 GMT
Received: from mcast-linux1.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by mcast-linux1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u4N3BNJr020856; Sun, 22 May 2016 20:11:23 -0700
Received: (from eckert@localhost) by mcast-linux1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id u4N3BLcW020853; Sun, 22 May 2016 20:11:21 -0700
Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 20:11:21 -0700
From: Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
Message-ID: <20160523031121.GA18318@cisco.com>
References: <C5B9F952-FEFC-4B73-9AC6-E050F59A74CB@consulintel.es> <CA+9kkMCQBdZOebSo9WwEd14+Bgh64Tpd+8BfF+uzbDRSV-gFxw@mail.gmail.com> <88c09ff2-51d0-d419-1253-ddd8e6049397@cisco.com> <CA+9kkMBi3pR+N3E21j=gNAKNNndX8NvpnwEJcNAYpJGpx6A6mw@mail.gmail.com> <093f7f6f-4d4a-334e-e476-a0b562bd9fd7@cisco.com> <5741EEE6.2040302@gmail.com> <c4aeef86-5c0b-1858-3340-1d1cf4dffcc3@cisco.com> <5741F491.7080908@gmail.com> <DB4PR06MB457C6319227941B3024666FAD4E0@DB4PR06MB457.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <2eb62b0a-87f1-11cd-5fdd-faad0f8b5593@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2eb62b0a-87f1-11cd-5fdd-faad0f8b5593@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/AqSHlWNeW9FVXrENLoJW3OCefX8>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 03:11:25 -0000

Actually Melinda, i did not understand from your first email what it would mean
for the example case in point (same sex significant other of an attendee).
Alas, it was also still not really clear to me from your reply below.

On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 06:26:12PM -0800, Melinda Shore wrote:
> On 5/22/16 6:03 PM, l.wood@surrey.ac.uk wrote:
> >Melinda,
> >
> >you mean like disadvantaging the families of attendees, who don't
> >participate in meetings,  rather than disadvantaging the attendees
> >who do?
> 
> No, actually, I don't.  I really don't like it that IETF
> meetings have turned into tourism and junkets, but if
> people in opposite-sex relationship can and do bring their
> families, it's pretty clear what label the inability of
> same-sex partnered participants to do the same would
> fall under.
> 
> Melinda