Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

Donald Eastlake <> Thu, 26 May 2016 04:03 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD09112D5DF for <>; Wed, 25 May 2016 21:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k71K2532bQ7Z for <>; Wed, 25 May 2016 21:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1926E12D5E1 for <>; Wed, 25 May 2016 21:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id w184so99167607oiw.2 for <>; Wed, 25 May 2016 21:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6JMlRvA8cK6DJhyC8/eRO3S6DtI+2875MEHgar2fDfA=; b=fTZ0zjIhGaJnGumt2tJL48RM5C8EMNzE+BmLQQzsD5oEdZypYJh3p2sWHxlF5xQ0rs csh3twldwvkAqbwjwyd/b/CYWge3r1QTX94zMRZS2fjxEQpNf/MjeVmNO9ZCap7199sX ypTImUIDYF6UgokH/Cgp/JkNdmAYysjh6oj0KDdoJcNY3P6NRpecgt4m3CoP4KPqzWVh yxrhvRzDKP6mJyp1KS397jVJKOGFVoIeK8aZ6hOnrwH5VWsuKtA0ZKZ0JMnjkU7xDjAl zDEzR3DHsOUDK9sxEGoH5wRnyCPDTO7ZXxqQS4fxlMD9sNHqPU0lZl01sdRRrEozMr+K YgOw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6JMlRvA8cK6DJhyC8/eRO3S6DtI+2875MEHgar2fDfA=; b=CUVnOoyKeBLdwn6StdPqj8JOEz2qbWcxLpu7i7g2HdEGI2gIxyi/P1e85fIPnBL5oX Itge0It3qJz43htS0XUGWiWPMjnzT9nl/Zze5St1j7XtruhJHRl1OS9IeYGj/eGNhfjY OOSLXBj/jd4Ad8A9MhCweOEU7DCUJBydIMt+HboLVdHqUfyF4umeHWgnRudJz5FN3ZBf RbdbCWbtiprWSY0e6txAwNGk4e5X9h2rubGeKe1vMjXFOXcS16c7S1g7eLjDVSjwcQVI Z9By5Gd5qgerrJUYDIlsVIhUaE2/HxwAf/UNzbZbN191XS77x0RQtnzpoF4g8hUcqPWx teQw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tL/fyQYlRTTpPkq8srM2KA5+FoVgP4UHLQsucd8q3YkKh356qw3wez3uZzG4+JD2FDPVxXqaJhKPR7a2A==
X-Received: by with SMTP id q187mr4903915oif.126.1464235434293; Wed, 25 May 2016 21:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with HTTP; Wed, 25 May 2016 21:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
From: Donald Eastlake <>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 00:03:39 -0400
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
To: Michael Richardson <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113dcfd8edc0720533b6e02d"
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "Ietf@Ietf. Org" <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 04:03:58 -0000

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Michael Richardson <>

> Barry, you said that you live there half the time.
> I think that the anxiety is that we do not hear good things about the state
> of the justice system.  (There are many other countries and US states were
> I
> think foreigners would equally anxious).
> I think that we are comfortable with Japan (for instance) because we have
> some idea of what, worse case, we could expect from the justice and medical
> apparatus.

I'm comfortable with Japan. It has a very low crime rate. I have relatives
who live there and my great-great grandfather, William Clark Eastlake, is
buried in Tokyo. But comfortable with what could be expected for justice in
Japan in the "worst case"? I assume you are joking:
And those articles doesn't even describe how harsh Japanese prisons are.

All courses in life involve risk. All nations have problems. There is no
hope for any policies that ignore probabilities and the weighing of
different considerations. As the IETF becomes increasingly diverse, we will
soon reach a point, if we are not there already, where every IETF meeting
will be boycotted by some potential attendee because of the country where
it is held.

Judging from postings, people think that Buenos Aires was fine. but I found
it to be, from the point of view of crimes against our our attendees, the
most crime ridden place I have ever attended any kind of meeting. IETF
meeting attendees were actually assaulted and robbed. At least a half dozen
and probably a lot more were squirted with fake bird poo. ATMs run by banks
inside bank offices spewed forth counterfeit money. People (including
myself) were routinely scammed by taxi drivers. But apparently, based on
most what most posters say, this is all fine because we have never been
there before and it gave a bunch of new people an opportunity to attend. So
it all depends on what weight you give to what factors....


Maybe you could speak to this part.
> --
> Michael Richardson <>, Sandelman Software Works
>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-