Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sun, 22 May 2016 04:54 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3AB412D14B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 May 2016 21:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id juaoKYDFYAVm for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 May 2016 21:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE50D12B010 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 May 2016 21:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.9] (unknown [210.213.187.0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7E0118013C8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 May 2016 06:54:07 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20160517181436.24852.58610.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <3945cc1f-3e99-0fcb-e983-ed2e46fa871c@nostrum.com> <CA+9kkMAWFQDrT6WqTGz=6LcDiBkg+iuLEuSzeSqfZA4-J-tvZg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMGpKFiA78iQDFa5xaM0r0q_3LfLO_JKxaWJ9CBUTeaLg@mail.gmail.c om> <C5B9F952-FEFC-4B73-9AC6-E050F59A74CB@consulintel.es> <5740A90E.2030200@gmail.com> <34CC7DDE-3341-4BF8-8238-B32176EDC72A@consulintel.es> <55BAE36899C13FA1D0565FAF@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <2ceffd31-c78f-f6f7-116e-85498b4413f1@gmail.com> <F4DAF475-4162-4A2B-9338-5DAF19AB3A38@cs.ucla.edu>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <c3e40ddb-abbe-bc01-51f0-0264ad3a19a9@pi.nu>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 12:54:00 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F4DAF475-4162-4A2B-9338-5DAF19AB3A38@cs.ucla.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/LYk0-IatPTxGul4FonmQyHn6esI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 04:54:12 -0000

Lixia et.al.,

On 2016-05-22 09:43, Lixia Zhang wrote:
>
>> On May 21, 2016, at 2:00 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>> In particular, "nice place to bring family or companion(s)" is
>>> either a selection criterion or it isn't.  I'm not talking about
>>> where it is in the list of priorities and tradeoffs; I'm talking
>>> about whether or not it is on the list.
>
> my vote is no.

there would be a difference between "nice" and "safe", right?

/Loa
>
>> It could be on the list if we believe that it has a significant
>> impact on attendance and therefore on financial viability. But
>> that's surely secondary to 'getting the work done' and 'getting the
>> best range of people to the meeting'.
>
> agree.
>
> Lixia
>