Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Tue, 24 May 2016 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC38212D504 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 12:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r99eGaXSrLrI for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 12:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22b.google.com (mail-pa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5450912D1D2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2016 12:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id xk12so9613319pac.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2016 12:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DR9jz0cfy9tQQSp9vUJ9fvpE/bgJ8muHiTKLThn+Mcw=; b=VZDmYWzy8o/tnJsk/OHVkLngDb3jS3GzayBoNvauKl0HUSha0bFBsHQ7iwJjWPvPSv PkKNzGkFdk46NwnYp9k8aC5UWryXgmPiZsnSiMHL8d1pznwsQpnX+A6I4m+7Arpv7xL5 T1ufLI+zXH2PZ20xcvYhMBXMNxMenEIpDGjvP3EA2nzXTFtqLRqKmY+UbFH4sXMwquuJ E3aPnchA58U2UNa5vbGdLDzN/B1UOqcijmBdH5ExBkZNkROBL6vawcCr23loxe3/5fxi QzjnQP1HQJ09fZIFpbB76Bme+O5D0IdB8lqx10yxe8sbO6mY7uA1YrRa9JLwgc628RF1 MMDA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DR9jz0cfy9tQQSp9vUJ9fvpE/bgJ8muHiTKLThn+Mcw=; b=HX2QQj9EYzH+s0aV+sv+y/OzI68M6b4z5+/XnQ0UFKR7p6Z01sstpyoqjIcPBF11bs uM7V3vLhE87BUnwRSAAiBp7EaAeZV92jjp9tYhbhan7AvANC+jU6auRmbJKMiDf+duVY oAnciL61FMIdRwD7VpPWZNQokxCUEItgWDcPXdxCAnnlgBazd8xB8xkxI7DsIoDnELYi x5E202TxA7PtK3PWwgxA2iTKfO+QYeTijJHJGjW1zokc8tyRl0nc9eS6tU8C0QKJw0c8 B19qmYFaMjqLrc4FLCtyZiwhnBhhfWGdDdF+9VCr0fIzmzl1jc9XKE8Y7u3l0s7WdOfK l4qA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIn7DQudYzAKGpKjld7AOXqjBUnGj7BiOFio3VDMS+9f/LmARKZaNcoJyic3811aQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.148.2 with SMTP id to2mr9659853pab.72.1464119347651; Tue, 24 May 2016 12:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local (69-161-4-89-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [69.161.4.89]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g195sm36956747pfb.7.2016.05.24.12.49.06 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 24 May 2016 12:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <D3662363.190A96%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <714DDDE2-562D-488A-AAAA-F8DE3C2CA97D@consulintel.es> <FE76F502-617E-4190-BFF5-649EC9CFECAC@consulintel.es> <CABcZeBMPAFdLwZTr7TCJC-tZ+X=CKGzQ7Jp0zqDO86PdPn6YvQ@mail.gmail.com> <8D82EA4F-1275-436C-8030-1E799F5D7F59@consulintel.es> <CABcZeBOCtk6JK_3w2_L87oyze+dfgy7fFyU7QrGmGgEtta1oZA@mail.gmail.com> <1CA535AB-CAC4-49CB-B094-AAA7FE3119FB@consulintel.es> <2b01eb8f-d319-7d20-0f84-9a774f9e0e44@nostrum.com> <C01AE269-3168-4B6A-B8D8-D97230288302@gmail.com> <8161273d-97c2-2757-5f0c-6146d0b297aa@nostrum.com> <E51DA1A2-AB3E-42F7-BC0A-308BE6B58580@gmail.com> <2270ea7c-cd6d-c3d5-e768-6d1f0ae15605@nostrum.com> <216D2B11-5E07-4DBE-BCC4-0A8ABCCB15B7@gmail.com> <cf9ad015-ef7d-6e11-44e8-6a0fb5a78b91@gmail.com> <EBBFC64A-C730-47D8-8F66-E4C7773A0344@gmail.com> <D5E06CF1-9C2D-41BE-8635-1F73321986EC@consulintel.es> <CAG4d1rfvYrW5TDCzdUoFeeQFnsDejWFn7jH+20xnJ4QHEsJ=2g@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1kG2_P5yBEOrajkNXZms438xRZuQTTcPnWnGDoqkYZCUQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <66d2fad7-ccc6-b63f-fb56-27b1c4f87174@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 11:48:46 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1kG2_P5yBEOrajkNXZms438xRZuQTTcPnWnGDoqkYZCUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/yOtTljcCB4Wg8oqk4BNmdHVfnKo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 19:49:10 -0000

On 5/24/16 11:41 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> If we are going to bring breastfeeding into this, which seems
> reasonable, it's worth asking if someone can actually construct a
> situation in which the breastfeeding mother would be present with the
> baby, but the local government would not recognize _her_ parental
> rights.

We looped down a side-road.  Apparently there's some feeling
that the way to solve the problem with familial rights in same-
sex families not being recognized in Singapore is to simply
eliminate the companion program (a very Kim Davis solution).
I said I don't like the companion program because I think it
tends to over-emphasize the role of meetings in our processes.
Alia answered with a concrete example of why the companion program
is useful and should be continued.  I don't think anybody
was arguing that there's a legal issue related to parental
rights around breastfeeding (although I understand that
there's a ton of legal issues, and local variability in
those legal issues, around public breastfeeding).

Melinda