Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 24 May 2016 13:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38E612D77A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AZSPnWD5tHu8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22f.google.com (mail-yw0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 184CD12D7BB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id o16so15982441ywd.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sUOeV25suG+xLp59mt3Bk79gh/ghuvAUofC2l8/Zumc=; b=Lq/qHyOb4R+dL5bFZSUdsVXR/2ij3iSLcgg3RLfeDYc4Jv/aIO20aX6Dkx9xzkOlcn 0MY/iGwwGSSmeT9iHzH1A9VZLCwXmLpCzoBDMEqhGMHAjyGc4tURC5cKrljjkG6ZFFJj aZOd0obsxG2N+iPzYADKtRZSoWu/AUyheCgW0yurVQuHva2OEz0Drr20De7dS6m97haS ibLnjCEaPb6vzoS/S0pk07wX1CuBNO9sLbtzW6WNJmRj7wFu7ZzmMj4O1ieHtwpflEY8 IFTVvxHfPrHMlOQZ81pWkMYg0Nf/UvEpHozsT4CyRWn7Ss7vy3rwt7Kr5EUMD7sVqCBW hDNw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sUOeV25suG+xLp59mt3Bk79gh/ghuvAUofC2l8/Zumc=; b=OXEwp8sb+nqXh5goUggyQFQmddQnbN7bxbYvHtaaMT7bS30cNDGRbrm0kuBsB2D3xd xLsv7h90Smeol3avZbBEoSyMPoY1suw+HgJS+tJ/w4boY+3kl5rcYduyWDicFzA/I1/f Lbgmb20USU3al5VwRsDZWsRynoDJ3JD1N7+w0v8k84p2RIMoXgZSK3juABcWbqkV40u9 jFZ3VfMtPTVbm5oXvl982Y5xPDU5ShI4pj0PLJfNdGGmNK0KJkLBJfN13n3suLZpnN39 h30KuHLCFLD7BgoiKfy/SMIvoG397XY9liQiQ6dyD5WJFev2U5ugYOUG56qzSo1zEKaO groQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKIeWIOC/zPXSQivO/8Wc8rfBxSQHTu9fGnE5eKe4QIPhRx4KbwHfxSXF5UNzzj+gxD2aaUr7w2pByEDw==
X-Received: by 10.129.4.8 with SMTP id 8mr2800765ywe.44.1464097626295; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.132.12 with HTTP; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <FE76F502-617E-4190-BFF5-649EC9CFECAC@consulintel.es>
References: <D3662363.190A96%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <CAP8yD=spam0tQdfD-ssA6y_n-cuugHtrHKwTYieSruo8SMg_VQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHkmkwtEtDk4sPv3GjkrSFqOdRV3HBA5i2_uZu3X2D4RxSF4wA@mail.gmail.com> <2e95fd51-23b8-39e7-d4ca-a9fc9d49559c@gmail.com> <CAHkmkwsf3YfFfR7jUHYnaw6dCrasMOazjbXPJRRhZS28k8HV0w@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1605241405210.28372@uplift.swm.pp.se> <714DDDE2-562D-488A-AAAA-F8DE3C2CA97D@consulintel.es> <FE76F502-617E-4190-BFF5-649EC9CFECAC@consulintel.es>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 06:46:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMPAFdLwZTr7TCJC-tZ+X=CKGzQ7Jp0zqDO86PdPn6YvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f575ceec177053396ca86
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ZNmeQR8IbgWOKghIPyQu5C2oqgA>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 13:47:15 -0000

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:25 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <
jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:

> I will go further:
>
>       The same must apply for any country where death penalty is still
> applied.
>

So I take it you oppose meeting in Singapore?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_Singapore

-Ekr




>
> Saludos,
> Jordi
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de Jordi Palet Martinez <
> jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
> Responder a: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
> Fecha: martes, 24 de mayo de 2016, 14:22
> Para: <ietf@ietf.org>
> Asunto: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward
> and request for input
>
> >+1
> >
> >Saludos,
> >Jordi
> >
> >
> >-----Mensaje original-----
> >De: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de Mikael Abrahamsson <
> swmike@swm.pp.se>
> >Organización: People's Front Against WWW
> >Responder a: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
> >Fecha: martes, 24 de mayo de 2016, 14:09
> >Para: Harish Pillay <harish.pillay@gmail.com>
> >CC: <ietf@ietf.org>
> >Asunto: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path
> forward and request for input
> >
> >>On Mon, 23 May 2016, Harish Pillay wrote:
> >>
> >>> ever used. That is my world experience. When I travel to the US and
> >>> I see people carrying weapons, how am I supposed to react/respond?
> >>
> >>Let me +1 this here, I am seriously scared for my life whenever I
> interact
> >>with law enforcement officers in the US, just from the fact that I know
> >>they have to interact with armed people all the time and have to be
> >>cautious that anyone they interact with has a decent likelyhood to be
> >>armed.
> >>
> >>
> http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-law-basics/states-that-have-stand-your-ground-laws.html
> >>
> >>If we can't go to Singapore because they happen to have anti-LGBT laws on
> >>the books, then I suggest we do not have any further meetings in USA at
> >>all, especially not states that have stand-your-ground laws on their
> >>books.
> >>
> >>As opposed to Singapore where anti-LGBT laws aren't really enforced, in
> >>USA these kinds of laws seems to be on the rise instead of things getting
> >>better.
> >>
> >>--
> >>Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >**********************************************
> >IPv4 is over
> >Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> >http://www.consulintel.es
> >The IPv6 Company
> >
> >This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the
> individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, including attached files, is prohibited.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>