Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

Margaret Cullen <margaretw42@gmail.com> Mon, 23 May 2016 17:26 UTC

Return-Path: <margaretw42@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED52C12D7E8; Mon, 23 May 2016 10:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.68
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.68 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.77, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rKb0B1jOXDUN; Mon, 23 May 2016 10:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22d.google.com (mail-qk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8491712D11A; Mon, 23 May 2016 10:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id y126so77540417qke.1; Mon, 23 May 2016 10:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=mEwYokMriFVoWMhagKp4FERhrbi0qkcLGSj2TVKzYcQ=; b=SIfjguVGiO1fcHWK5k49xVo959gjRsCq+OROh9HVq1K+ihbSwVow2Q+LGGjuC0ZPPK clwq2KzxOzPAniSNEsi9AwBqMUCKzwDMHf+yboLyP2nf9Lp5C536f5k/uwwsqpaq5wY/ EGptMAGqqOzR7CP0fkIJHxQMldjqqGDh2oLCgDJs7bY0k9KvmERezgmaFH3nik5Uc08E b8+juxgsIA7Chd+nmpKu6Lp9OY8U2oAH/AqUQ8FsoU31gioeRnfikxuFkEVTqsE4P8HU MVyqGUsW0B+H6Ot6J1LTHnOulbVgTqW5BlFTiz5KrmHtkK2eUo08pmXnQaCvpeHCbcwU ffWg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=mEwYokMriFVoWMhagKp4FERhrbi0qkcLGSj2TVKzYcQ=; b=lE8VFA61Bdv+T8R2BSdPZjFtPNYsgQIimUVmYHu8ZIozjx1bWWViDZZCORTcOeYOxP wPfvwlNr3gfugnNtAzh0hojjEqV+dcIVtVfCU6xT2jlAoI2WwGIpAdrQyH7RQYHZ5ms5 056MJwWTy8Y5mX7F3aNKlXKI5hlMbX6QX56hQhZDobK3QaVT/PDaIJqdnGeDITvK+aPT HVXAVOb4FYmiAlJBiLvyg5a3SsHUjAfW2RG3Jt9VUjmfiSy7oxZtTX+iztOA4e7YQ+/n ut06JodsLkcQR5yE1APQMhxW8a+2lOTDDTUXKn9QI4msgJPo4vpN9LKr2/t1iWu2yuQr TXJg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJeCCjX5pkb6fLTxADOen62U3IQO9kTW4ITXb54Rj9nr1+BocSovq9yj9lhHtTQ7w==
X-Received: by 10.237.44.162 with SMTP id g31mr6640162qtd.67.1464024379630; Mon, 23 May 2016 10:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.10.5] (mfd2336d0.tmodns.net. [208.54.35.253]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n77sm6135791qhb.13.2016.05.23.10.26.18 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 23 May 2016 10:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Margaret Cullen <mrcullen42@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
From: Margaret Cullen <margaretw42@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3945cc1f-3e99-0fcb-e983-ed2e46fa871c@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 13:26:16 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <035A1977-6142-42DE-9230-B431EAEAFB41@gmail.com>
References: <20160517181436.24852.58610.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <3945cc1f-3e99-0fcb-e983-ed2e46fa871c@nostrum.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/yWZ0HBCb0LH5g1Gssk-biP-Z3h0>
Cc: venue-selection@ietf.org, IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 17:26:22 -0000

> On May 17, 2016, at 3:19 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> But to be clear: I will almost certainly forgo attending a meeting at which any of my GLBTQ colleagues felt unwelcome. I would actively encourage others to adopt the same stance. Whether this forms a barrier to a successful meeting is up for debate; however, It would almost certainly be a setback for the working groups I chair.

+1

I, too, will forgo any meeting that some of our colleagues feel would be unsafe for them to attend based on their race, religion, gender, sexual preference or gender expression.  

Margaret