Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

Barry Raveendran Greene <bgreene@senki.org> Tue, 24 May 2016 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <bgreene@senki.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F09E12D17E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 12:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FUyTWgu_IVCR for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 12:56:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp78.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (smtp78.ord1c.emailsrvr.com [108.166.43.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E34A12D13D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2016 12:56:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp26.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp26.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id EB36D380235; Tue, 24 May 2016 15:56:30 -0400 (EDT)
X-Auth-ID: bgreene@senki.org
Received: by smtp26.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: bgreene-AT-senki.org) with ESMTPSA id E78DC3803E5; Tue, 24 May 2016 15:56:29 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sender-Id: bgreene@senki.org
Received: from sin-mpgjx.santaclara.corp.akamai.com ([UNAVAILABLE]. [23.79.235.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:587 (trex/5.5.4); Tue, 24 May 2016 15:56:30 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
From: Barry Raveendran Greene <bgreene@senki.org>
In-Reply-To: <50752203-0d58-c913-19d4-ad3ef28dd0e1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 12:56:27 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6AE4B8A4-2C2A-4681-B31A-5F5AC1823B40@senki.org>
References: <69237AF1-40D0-4A90-A571-221FFB6DFFBA@senki.org> <50752203-0d58-c913-19d4-ad3ef28dd0e1@gmail.com>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/CjVIM1S8g83gzOQOh9hQQwyoYSc>
Cc: "Ietf@Ietf. Org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 19:56:35 -0000

> On May 24, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Can you speak directly to the question of familial legal rights?

In which context of “familial legal rights?" Remember, this issue is going to take a good decade to work through the US system. Other parts of the world will evolve based on the priorities each society deems necessary.

Perhaps a explicit concern?