Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Wed, 25 May 2016 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C5F12D7E3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2016 08:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l1zCW8qqgrYn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2016 08:08:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22a.google.com (mail-pa0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48C3312D7FE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 May 2016 08:06:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id eu11so9437347pad.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 May 2016 08:06:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YU4aNzC50emqh5H0oYqT8p7el8JfKDNtQX9i7aQHCsw=; b=Z5HNH2IWHR8fGtOrHL+6HvavtOx6Rv/zFgIw3VQJ8qX8iVqMnNISi+8Wmr+RMvXOUc LYTwCXIdDWxnMafvk/yqxP9lGigRuB1yVgGaYlhpNHxYtlcq9lVuftLSNg6GaXoKwTnv hgLeVJCD+92ioxDGINdnUR+1TKWHqaQuKwH0X3amWMe0rg7IPcLukns5oj3TEYO7OL+w w/x0MasKhh1WX7dAzLxu3EHGz1NXMJCxm3eMYwXJ6Op3xZWDE0/lNUz8/3U583zyp+bR 3+gnbtE4qZDHHNJT3n5Pv0qmF7nXnCR68L3bDcVUNNFF8ID1J7o1l/WPHuQ2tz8Tf+FF lFQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YU4aNzC50emqh5H0oYqT8p7el8JfKDNtQX9i7aQHCsw=; b=LqPds0HTEdAn6v+z690Js/g03KAI1Pom3naT1NjXmgEekQ2fpDFv0xq4UlGxOR5SF1 r55T0wlrCnT7UpI/u3UtYWZp3smi4h/bouo8ReL3hnO1mLwGcSwFMLiJj8T87UqynOM8 FT0OX2GN7WD931U30xnpsXtrX57/4+8iV0pkW5fvc68SzADNCe1GU34qkdBzKHx1zDyc S319kqU1D30I55S0cOL24Hn3PHBmq1Li4l/3w/8dVsh8XqneBwfFxkcyyfljvrI2GKmH tQA6xZtGAp/rq943cSYNEASACk8K9hmrhqCR7GdF3hanagQchgFeeIJfGfTWKn329wpZ gVVw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLZIwL7kLrLSpDCLf0DivSEuBRjAs46/TB9RnhG2z8PTzU/6aFEtrFgfYHq57RBzg==
X-Received: by 10.66.66.10 with SMTP id b10mr6640524pat.12.1464188812837; Wed, 25 May 2016 08:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local (63-140-104-230-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [63.140.104.230]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p187sm62676074pfb.3.2016.05.25.08.06.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 25 May 2016 08:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
To: nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com, Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com>
References: <20160524210344.64781.qmail@ary.lan> <bd1f61ef-3be2-1a16-804c-68548df0b789@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1605242300120.194@rabdullah.local> <da508fd5-307c-c61e-5b72-185238414a9c@gmail.com> <1936013436.371962.1464185835726.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <439c30dc-3d3c-e6e3-43f2-812a66496379@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 07:06:12 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1936013436.371962.1464185835726.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gHYOZlhf-RkYQWeUndYPnGpJ3K0>
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 15:08:01 -0000

On 5/25/16 6:17 AM, nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com wrote:
> So, it is not OK to put an additional burden sometimes on GLBT people
> but it is OK to put an additional burden on Asian and African and
> other people as far as cost, racism, visa, etc, etc?

Perhaps we should regard this as an opportunity to talk
about which forms of bigotry we'll accommodate and which
we won't.

Melinda