Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Wed, 25 May 2016 07:02 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=19537eb73b=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A22712D988 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2016 00:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3y-L_Jxvw8O0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2016 00:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.com (mail.consulintel.com [213.0.69.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C97412D986 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 May 2016 00:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.com, Wed, 25 May 2016 09:02:03 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.99] by mail.consulintel.com (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50000547019.msg for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 May 2016 09:02:02 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.com, Wed, 25 May 2016 09:02:02 +0200 (not processed: spam filter heuristic analysis disabled)
X-MDOP-RefID: re=0.000,fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0)
X-Return-Path: prvs=19537eb73b=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ietf@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.16.0.160506
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 09:02:00 +0200
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <F153A2F2-12DE-4609-A7A4-F12A4AB971AE@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
References: <D3662363.190A96%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <CABcZeBMPAFdLwZTr7TCJC-tZ+X=CKGzQ7Jp0zqDO86PdPn6YvQ@mail.gmail.com> <8D82EA4F-1275-436C-8030-1E799F5D7F59@consulintel.es> <CABcZeBOCtk6JK_3w2_L87oyze+dfgy7fFyU7QrGmGgEtta1oZA@mail.gmail.com> <1CA535AB-CAC4-49CB-B094-AAA7FE3119FB@consulintel.es> <2b01eb8f-d319-7d20-0f84-9a774f9e0e44@nostrum.com> <C01AE269-3168-4B6A-B8D8-D97230288302@gmail.com> <8161273d-97c2-2757-5f0c-6146d0b297aa@nostrum.com> <E51DA1A2-AB3E-42F7-BC0A-308BE6B58580@gmail.com> <2270ea7c-cd6d-c3d5-e768-6d1f0ae15605@nostrum.com> <216D2B11-5E07-4DBE-BCC4-0A8ABCCB15B7@gmail.com> <cf9ad015-ef7d-6e11-44e8-6a0fb5a78b91@gmail.com> <EBBFC64A-C730-47D8-8F66-E4C7773A0344@gmail.com> <D5E06CF1-9C2D-41BE-8635-1F73321986EC@consulintel.es> <CAG4d1rfvYrW5TDCzdUoFeeQFnsDejWFn7jH+20xnJ4QHEsJ=2g@mail.gmail.com> <F2144741-4441-4F6E-B91E-6AEB52BCA7CF@consulintel.es> <CAG4d1rdC2SBC6F4-8MJGsJBt7kbJ+kRA5MKC5ZVUyhjCUJLkCg@mail.gmail.com> <201BB54E-ECEF-46F3-BE79-FBDF12CAAD40@consulintel.es> <72db82ac-e272-f269-f15e-0bcde9a1582e@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <72db82ac-e272-f269-f15e-0bcde9a1582e@gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/EvbdXS9TcBvvqFNUMj2dvAEbh5g>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 07:02:10 -0000

Believe me, not a conjecture at all. I’ve been in that situation in Spain with one of our co-workers a few years ago.

Saludos,
Jordi


-----Mensaje original-----
De: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Responder a: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Fecha: miércoles, 25 de mayo de 2016, 4:14
Para: <ietf@ietf.org>
Asunto: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

>On 5/24/16 2:20 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>> I said this already a few messages ago. If instead of the IETF is a
>> business meeting that your boss tell you need to go (at least in my
>> country, and here comes what you said about different cultures), you
>> will have no choice: a) Go there b) You’re fired, maybe unless a
>> colleague can make it for you and your boss accept it But
>> definitively, you will not be able to argue in front of a court to
>> defend your job that you can’t go there because your family need to
>> go there with you and that country don’t allow it.
>
>Allow me to suggest that you know no such thing, and that
>you're presenting a strawman argument that may, in fact,
>be completely false.  US companies tend to come down on the
>side of supporting diversity and rejecting bigotry - take
>a look at the response to North Carolina's HB2.
>
>It's fine to make conjectures, but please couch it in
>terms of "I think this is what would happen."  I believe
>that in this case you'd be incorrect.
>
>Melinda
>
>