Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Mon, 23 May 2016 02:26 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF03212D601 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 May 2016 19:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jOZ_XRObUkA9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 May 2016 19:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x233.google.com (mail-pf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86C2112D5D1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 May 2016 19:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id b124so2458357pfb.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 May 2016 19:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DxMho9oPr1RrkVB5VCWTzkJMAhy2H1A5OUnYcsELPcI=; b=ID/UY6q394p56XqR9XKPOqw1S53bO0MZaeGT1MsGD6YY9mnyjNy68sa6E5haD7mKI5 LVw8EVl+O15W7PoiA+BOxnbpDzH8+Dj7QMaQNuWFz6O1p4Yw/j5LZLU+Y+OVrLm8mBAE Vcq/EYi1ZIZzihhhl60P9AU5lVqcFje0aw/d8X8O7mzQ8b8SHKD71GeHI4SDufp7vdx4 TgPh+BGxpqVeFxyON8CwB3Xyinm75SNe/XH8CNZUZeiNzc50KngMEX0G0re9JDTEBpz7 6CD46zJd95RKoFDjvgrAg2+K11/paDKpEeoMu48QtyRLsqAahaKC5VoAWC0jxMXFMU2O ASGw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DxMho9oPr1RrkVB5VCWTzkJMAhy2H1A5OUnYcsELPcI=; b=GgLnGNDNhW7FYU7JhVMxtfFvYdLrkp+VswlPsZfgCjEwAD7nq834dpRdOm0yRVBx73 MkM4ZXOhwVPVUJKKXnIcXKNfq99Z6KcPnQy+QIeSMk5zgi8p5rY9mph43n3+JAeeY9hk vYROzJiusEQqtTAb8sCTRlKSwOrxaENyQpoypO7tnmPXZ24FuyMPAx9Dvt8tvApMqvRC gszsktEc0afLRPG20OqHVvN6YbIOL5ZTS+he3XWKVtqbhnjp3ijgXIaRO74vtCdYkpIm Any9Kf7ZdAwqOaiWGJw4eaRgDYhJvQuYLqpS8fXebpo95Lq5Yi8VXS9hIITsebYSEiCO jmQA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUNg3dRoaPow+rZDBSX0unYcxfZuSPdFPEhFodZKwB+vuZWm1vWSF5l5btglDfg0Q==
X-Received: by 10.98.78.132 with SMTP id c126mr23691778pfb.129.1463970387100; Sun, 22 May 2016 19:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local (209-193-29-52-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [209.193.29.52]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id lq8sm6286249pab.40.2016.05.22.19.26.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 22 May 2016 19:26:26 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
To: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk, lear@cisco.com, ietf@ietf.org
References: <20160517181436.24852.58610.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <3945cc1f-3e99-0fcb-e983-ed2e46fa871c@nostrum.com> <CA+9kkMAWFQDrT6WqTGz=6LcDiBkg+iuLEuSzeSqfZA4-J-tvZg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMGpKFiA78iQDFa5xaM0r0q_3LfLO_JKxaWJ9CBUTeaLg@mail.gmail.com> <C5B9F952-FEFC-4B73-9AC6-E050F59A74CB@consulintel.es> <CA+9kkMCQBdZOebSo9WwEd14+Bgh64Tpd+8BfF+uzbDRSV-gFxw@mail.gmail.com> <88c09ff2-51d0-d419-1253-ddd8e6049397@cisco.com> <CA+9kkMBi3pR+N3E21j=gNAKNNndX8NvpnwEJcNAYpJGpx6A6mw@mail.gmail.com> <093f7f6f-4d4a-334e-e476-a0b562bd9fd7@cisco.com> <5741EEE6.2040302@gmail.com> <c4aeef86-5c0b-1858-3340-1d1cf4dffcc3@cisco.com> <5741F491.7080908@gmail.com> <DB4PR06MB457C6319227941B3024666FAD4E0@DB4PR06MB457.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2eb62b0a-87f1-11cd-5fdd-faad0f8b5593@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 18:26:12 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DB4PR06MB457C6319227941B3024666FAD4E0@DB4PR06MB457.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/oW-bzMfyXtrCBcmykasncBQlPoE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 02:26:29 -0000

On 5/22/16 6:03 PM, l.wood@surrey.ac.uk wrote:
> Melinda,
>
> you mean like disadvantaging the families of attendees, who don't
> participate in meetings,  rather than disadvantaging the attendees
> who do?

No, actually, I don't.  I really don't like it that IETF
meetings have turned into tourism and junkets, but if
people in opposite-sex relationship can and do bring their
families, it's pretty clear what label the inability of
same-sex partnered participants to do the same would
fall under.

Melinda