Re: IETF 107 Vancouver In-Person Meeting Cancelled

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Wed, 11 March 2020 16:22 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932633A0C8C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8y1GUR1WmJgt for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C6973A0C80 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:22:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 57E7BB1; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:22:48 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1583943768; bh=KrTR4c9o3eJI1zV/KmSsxhwIhJeNvvhy/L8y48RdsVk=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=a0uMWI5sS9jYxoiVmYv2dlTVP955+TvtluH3dLcsKuHZYi8Tp0Ia1Mp8S5JXhWbSZ /unlz9tZyBWpTaC5d67peEMIg4jH+i/wCbNiNOWwcVPJ+mG0tJy/SLy1iBX469Y5a9 jWul098aFJ8TxZWxFTfG7i7lEJ+PHO6SalN9e6Qk=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553DF9F; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:22:48 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:22:48 +0100 (CET)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>
cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IETF 107 Vancouver In-Person Meeting Cancelled
In-Reply-To: <74FF55B3-EF71-471B-8A82-EDAE88B001B2@consulintel.es>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2003111721350.20418@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <158386742797.16091.1025684270011519738@ietfa.amsl.com> <52EE5E3F-E83A-4F81-8F48-6B94AB0A5C7D@akamai.com> <4B6380B9-CBBB-4275-BDA6-F086D66D6DBA@cooperw.in> <A893CAF9-B9B3-4E1A-9D09-0EEEE996E635@akamai.com> <1C525937-E47A-48F8-90D1-7903EC2881A3@cooperw.in> <25231974-29B2-4651-ACE3-E7616E8E302A@consulintel.es> <5d0fa605-736b-61ba-0dc7-761e7cd0e7f8@foobar.org> <D54BBEEC-D122-48F8-9BBA-289182568822@consulintel.es> <18DE48F1-3B54-4015-96D4-5FCE66BB87B4@me.com> <74FF55B3-EF71-471B-8A82-EDAE88B001B2@consulintel.es>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/6QAV1FXv9h_SvXtYQqOTrL0i7A4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:22:53 -0000

On Wed, 11 Mar 2020, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:

> Someone send me a private email (suggested to send to the list) that 
> effectively shows that the virus is not resistent to heat, so as much as 
> we move towards spring/summer, less chances to propagate. Of course, we 
> should not ask to have the meeting rooms freezing!

There is also humidity factor

https://www.livescience.com/27533-flu-transmission-humidity.html

"At humidity levels of 23 percent, 70 to 77 percent of the flu virus 
particles were still able to cause an infection an hour after the coughing 
simulation. But when humidity levels were raised to 43 percent, just 14 
percent of the virus particles had the ability to infect. Most of the flu 
particles became inactive 15 minutes after they were released into the 
humid air. "The virus just falls apart," at high humidity levels, said 
study researcher John Noti, of the CDC's National Institute for 
Occupational Safety and Health."

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se