IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF 107 Vancouver In-Person Meeting Cancelled

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 11 March 2020 03:50 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1D43A109A; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 216jdLLxwW4k; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 526B13A109D; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050102.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 02B3fAOF008915; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:50:03 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=Zrng/OaO4aEjbuwTx0qmnJADZ1gpM9Na+/jogtLq3x8=; b=oWN312+grm84RKwBJqqDX8xbfxOw+J7fLK61IbLuadSuXgH/JVi28mX7hptp1mNEI0tR 7c52qJo22EPAhILxZu5BAx7prBeUGi1XHMC1K3/Xcj2RaxQaJ2CMe/VhToerw6DbH5d3 A6pUNqMCHIUo2Y8s+hvk1VwwBwFRUH6QNUk2FgXcbVo9S998wtEDwvfmEDhOvh4rcbkA xo8Fl0QgEmReqTOpzNlVWUhajjTjT0CZpL0M0PzH9Per/gehXmhTuE7XPPUEZD0e0q9N ZQwq5ze8AvUNG3MEpynFB2GfMXj7nZS8wjQwpdTTEuT+bVDdnvOtg5dWfA4aDSD3k24Z hA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint3 (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [96.6.114.86] (may be forged)) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2ymu5j3jsk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:50:03 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 02B3lSqb009429; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 23:50:02 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.31]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2ym7u2wn3e-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 23:50:01 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 23:50:00 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 23:50:00 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
CC: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IETF 107 Vancouver In-Person Meeting Cancelled
Thread-Topic: IETF 107 Vancouver In-Person Meeting Cancelled
Thread-Index: AQHV9w+cSEytLnerpECYUlkjcb5PEahCM/uAgABIbwD//72nAIAArh6A///Z94A=
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:49:59 +0000
Message-ID: <50128B68-CDC3-4BF6-8DCA-43C0DAFEB644@akamai.com>
References: <158386742797.16091.1025684270011519738@ietfa.amsl.com> <52EE5E3F-E83A-4F81-8F48-6B94AB0A5C7D@akamai.com> <4B6380B9-CBBB-4275-BDA6-F086D66D6DBA@cooperw.in> <A893CAF9-B9B3-4E1A-9D09-0EEEE996E635@akamai.com> <8CC7A415-6D80-4C22-ADDE-F9544A9E01B3@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <8CC7A415-6D80-4C22-ADDE-F9544A9E01B3@ietf.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.35.20030802
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.65.236]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_50128B68CDC34BF68DCA43C0DAFEB644akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-03-10_17:2020-03-10, 2020-03-10 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=867 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2002050000 definitions=main-2003110022
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-03-10_17:2020-03-10, 2020-03-10 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=846 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2003110021
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/JhzDE6Dwj2cEdrwWh2WBsrpUcE8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:50:08 -0000

  *   I certainly intend to have an internal debrief to identify any outstanding issues and lessons for next time and then share details of that and get comment.  This is important as a number of decisions were made on the fly and we need to circle back to have those validated/challenged.  For example, our decision to follow public health advice was made in the absence of a community decision and was maintained despite a few community members expressing very strong disagreement (largely in private).

Look forward to seeing that.  Thanks.



  *   Yes the LLC track was entirely separate and focused primarily on the health risk.  I would welcome a discussion about the reasoning and decision making around this as part of the process outlined above.

Great!

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email