Re: IETF 107 Vancouver In-Person Meeting Cancelled

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 10 March 2020 19:41 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06DDA3A0A06 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JtEVdept04dN for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D59C03A099D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050096.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 02AJOUI9017564; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 19:40:59 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=rELsEv3wyOO8C0BJa9ohN4P1Q/h9Eq9I+5bBT3x/McA=; b=DvtsQs35fm3Ksnkm9J0CG33ffOYRuKOYDKjVS+PDvsCYmvopJe7MU5iaWhAYr8KaPI8l Yo8hmwCtY72oPzn9HT3dSVGpwpyujI5uonNT6qhRZ0BW/6QqzYxscfbrPZd9SmSuNVCn mo8xK7NtJzkNBfvVciNGXmDktDPUdd1D0TSnnByREvRHGPiYRPstTKxZ3I04ycNRM7C6 Y9+HpbJODTQXQXKFG1SHG/d45iXD2QhZsofZQ2MwLAHFnRsXFkRXtI17mzlcqMjHDN4h KZii7ezq/xs1L+5d/ErDOIOdb3eisLMUDfsNonKnmXtNSxBYOMfoZ9DYrN6bMkk99OQ3 6A==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint7 (prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com [96.6.114.121] (may be forged)) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2ym4wenkcr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 19:40:59 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 02AJWpvM010980; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:40:58 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2ym7u1egve-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:40:58 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:40:57 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:40:57 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:40:57 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IETF 107 Vancouver In-Person Meeting Cancelled
Thread-Topic: IETF 107 Vancouver In-Person Meeting Cancelled
Thread-Index: AQHV9w+cSEytLnerpECYUlkjcb5PEahCdfyAgAAC+YCAAALvgP//vZ4A
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 19:40:56 +0000
Message-ID: <EEF4BE0D-2EAC-4300-9131-49B3E1CE7601@akamai.com>
References: <158386742797.16091.1025684270011519738@ietfa.amsl.com> <BY5PR06MB64513EEB752EE41D99F238EBB1FF0@BY5PR06MB6451.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <CABcZeBPdrsAr3irayc5uiyBHZP3doxSi25MNM-3DSohoZkiGqA@mail.gmail.com> <35d2daf5-c7d5-f77b-b509-21dbea96224e@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <35d2daf5-c7d5-f77b-b509-21dbea96224e@cs.tcd.ie>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.35.20030802
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.65.236]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <B22FC956462BFD4C91705C49771CE132@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-03-10_13:2020-03-10, 2020-03-10 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2002050000 definitions=main-2003100114
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-03-10_13:2020-03-10, 2020-03-10 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=986 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2003100114
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/rKakyO4K3MoCbvu5b6Ja5EnwDfU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 19:41:15 -0000

>    Agreed. I can also understand why the decision took until
    now. Different people's risk perceptions differ so I'm
    sure others will quite reasonably disagree with me on
    this, but with all the behind-the-scenes stuff that had
    to be considered, in addition to the ongoing (and many
    v. recent) changes people's travel plans, I do totally
    get why it took 'till today to make the call.
  
Good.  Share it with the rest of us.