Re: IETF 107 Vancouver In-Person Meeting Cancelled

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 11 March 2020 10:51 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C443A16C0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:51:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.668
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.668 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V0eUs4RTWPhT for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:51:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F02B3A16BF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:51:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 02BAowjH002666 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 11:50:58 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 7727B202791 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 11:50:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D50C2053D2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 11:50:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 02BAotpP027761 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 11:50:55 +0100
Subject: Re: IETF 107 Vancouver In-Person Meeting Cancelled
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <158386742797.16091.1025684270011519738@ietfa.amsl.com> <52EE5E3F-E83A-4F81-8F48-6B94AB0A5C7D@akamai.com> <4B6380B9-CBBB-4275-BDA6-F086D66D6DBA@cooperw.in> <A893CAF9-B9B3-4E1A-9D09-0EEEE996E635@akamai.com> <8CC7A415-6D80-4C22-ADDE-F9544A9E01B3@ietf.org> <50128B68-CDC3-4BF6-8DCA-43C0DAFEB644@akamai.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e8c20f10-b20e-4737-485e-ac39cf10d19c@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 11:50:55 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <50128B68-CDC3-4BF6-8DCA-43C0DAFEB644@akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ijck9dVaNzrbgguy4Hqx7sFJ42o>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:51:02 -0000


Le 11/03/2020 à 04:49, Salz, Rich a écrit :
>   * I certainly intend to have an internal debrief to identify any
>     outstanding issues and lessons for next time and then share details
>     of that and get comment.  This is important as a number of decisions
>     were made on the fly and we need to circle back to have those
>     validated/challenged.  For example, our decision to follow public
>     health advice was made in the absence of a community decision and
>     was maintained despite a few community members expressing very
>     strong disagreement (largely in private).
> 
> Look forward to seeing that.  Thanks.
> 
>   * Yes the LLC track was entirely separate and focused primarily on the
>     health risk.  I would welcome a discussion about the reasoning and
>     decision making around this as part of the process outlined above.

I am interested in the results of the debrief.

Alex

> 
> Great!
>