Re: IETF 107 Vancouver In-Person Meeting Cancelled

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Sun, 15 March 2020 17:43 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D463A199E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 10:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.67
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.67 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MWiaTJQK_-tu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 10:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CA9E3A198F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 10:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 02FHgvLN015051 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 18:42:57 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 1615720111F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 18:42:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5A8200DE7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 18:42:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.113.140] ([10.8.113.140]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 02FHgtq6020146 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 18:42:55 +0100
Subject: Re: IETF 107 Vancouver In-Person Meeting Cancelled
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <158386742797.16091.1025684270011519738@ietfa.amsl.com> <7D26D5BD-FD39-47D1-81D5-73D7BFCF09F8@consulintel.es> <ced52e6d-7cee-f529-a5dc-187329b42da1@comcast.net> <5C06DE55-2522-473F-9F85-5A929196DD04@consulintel.es> <20200310203449.GA12384@gsp.org> <3CAF3B2E-A958-4E41-901F-C391513B65BF@consulintel.es> <fa392022-6817-ed4c-2d11-ee88af4d6684@gmail.com> <F8829B0A-6A02-44FC-B0C5-D586F40332F5@consulintel.es> <CABmDk8k+UP=wEjH=CjgmTUhdb2WEqNyPWSSbQdR5O1TwP9QTGA@mail.gmail.com> <20200315100507.GB18814@gsp.org> <CE29CC60-CD4E-4A1B-98D6-3D71815EDE3A@consulintel.es> <ed2dcfba-38dc-2bc3-2257-6382b45672ce@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <38ed12d2-9dc0-ea69-aa38-e1c4b5ccd01b@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 18:42:55 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ed2dcfba-38dc-2bc3-2257-6382b45672ce@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------DFFDFA8336B3ED0D15D7A2E8"
Content-Language: fr
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/X_LOUywdZ_s6JoHYwOx--HwQnhY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 17:43:02 -0000

Le 15/03/2020 à 18:40, Alexandre Petrescu a écrit :
>
> Le 15/03/2020 à 13:24, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ a écrit :
>> According to a documentary displayed yesterday in the TV, it looks 
>> like there are (up to now) 2 models to combat the propagation of the 
>> virus:
>>
>> 1) Chinese model, which is the same adopted in Italy and now Spain, 
>> quarantining everyone via an "alarm state" law. You can go to work 
>> only if needed, do shopping for food, but not go out of home for 
>> visiting friends, sports or fun. Only food shops can remain open, and 
>> a few other exceptions (pharmacies, banks).
>>
>> 2) The S. Korean model, which is testing lots of people and 
>> quarantine only for those that don't pass the test.
>
>
> yes talk here also talks about differnet models.
>
> Among the ones in alarm state, one should count Romania as well, 
> although not sure they can really do it.  The official orders are 
> almost total closure, but implementation is not sure.
>
> Among those in 'gradual' state - appropriate response to an an 
> evolving situation, is also France - publicly declared so - a gradual 
> evolution.
>
> There are also those who leave almost all open: UK, if I understand well.
>
> Codogno (Italy) earlier blocking seems to work: two weeks later no new 
> cases, apparently.
>
> To understand the different degrees of closure one can read the 
> official orders issued yesterday, today ('decret', 'order', etc).
>
> ------------------
>
> The medical theory is the following: if each of us (100% of our 
> species) stays away from each other, then in 2 weeks time all viruses 
> with crown are at hospital.
>
> But the wave is of 3month and a half long.  The difference between 2 
> weeks, and 3 months and a half, represents our difficulty  to 
> understand it, and it costs us our dearest.
>
> ------------------
>
> The China new cases goes up instead of down, but it is still low. 
> Chinese declare the event ended, officially.
>
> ------------------
>
> The excellent news is the following: social distancing means to stay 
> away (more than 1m) from each other.  YOu can do that by staying at 
> home instead of going to work.  But you can do that also by travelling 
> (provided youre sole in the bus, or so).  One can also share the 
> beautiful  view of a sunset outdoors, with a few persons with whom to 
> share destiny, but no more.
>
> Another excellent news: one is not forced to isolate all air intake in 
> one's appartment, or not breathe while outdoors.  Just to stay away 
> from unknown people.
>
> It's not like in other kinds of events which are worse, where you have 
> to isolate, stay inside, 'calfeutrer' (fr.), 'caulk'?(english).
>
> There is a new word: 'social distancing'.  It is 'distanciation 
> sociale' in French, since yesterday. (distantiation, distanciation, 
> distanceation, not sure).
>
> Alex


Funnily I saw this Tab why browsing a UK site about the virus:


There is a crown, but something is not right.

https://www.gov.uk/government/topical-events/coronavirus-covid-19-uk-government-response

Alex

>
>>
>> It looks like the S. Korean model is working, so either there are 
>> different tests, which are not reading the same, or something else.
>>
>> Maybe someone from S. Korea can tell?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jordi
>> @jordipalet
>>
>> El 15/3/20 11:06, "ietf en nombre de Rich Kulawiec" 
>> <ietf-bounces@ietf.org en nombre de rsk@gsp.org> escribió:
>>
>>      On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 10:07:12AM -0500, Mary B wrote:
>>      > Just one comment on your item #1 in your proposal. Your body 
>> does not
>>      > immediately develop the antibodies upon exposure, so you can 
>> be a carrier
>>      > well before you'll test positive. You'd also selfishly be 
>> adding to the
>>      > burden on the system for testing.
>>           This is absolutely correct.  Hospitals here are trying to 
>> clear
>>      out as many non-critical cases as possible, to postpone any
>>      surgical procedures that they can, to stockpile supplies, to give
>>      staff as much rest as they can, etc.  They are expecting the worst
>>      and anything that we can all do to decrease the need for care
>>      across the entire population will help.
>>           ---rsk
>>
>>
>>
>> **********************************************
>> IPv4 is over
>> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>> http://www.theipv6company.com
>> The IPv6 Company
>>
>> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged 
>> or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive 
>> use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty 
>> authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents 
>> of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is 
>> strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you 
>> are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, 
>> distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
>> partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be 
>> considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original 
>> sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
>>
>>
>>