Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

[Melinda Shore <[e-mail]>]

On 5/25/16 12:36 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> It's probably easier to enumerate who's excluded than who's included:

No, it's still not really working.

Would we, for example, be willing to meet in a place that
criminalizes Muslims or Jews or Hindus?  I sincerely hope not,
and I don't think that we would.

I suppose it would provide some small personal assurance if the IETF,
in fact, would meet in such a place and the issue here is not that
people here are comfortable excluding GLBT people as a class.  (I'd
skip that meeting, too, for whatever it's worth).

Melinda