IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Sat, 06 December 2014 14:00 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F561A9044 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 06:00:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sWznEIKu-ctW for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 06:00:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D80541A9040 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 06:00:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.22.19.252] ([12.216.224.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sB6E0d82029875 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 6 Dec 2014 08:00:42 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [12.216.224.110] claimed to be [172.22.19.252]
References: <E3FA0C72-48C5-465E-AE15-EB19D8D563A7@ieca.com> <54820E74.90201@mozilla.com> <FCDCD184-549C-4111-ACDB-7C466A2EE9D1@apple.com> <548260D2.2020703@nostrum.com> <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD2339987D08@XMB122CNC.rim.net> <5482CEB3.8030000@alvestrand.no> <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD23399884B8@XMB122CNC.rim.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD23399884B8@XMB122CNC.rim.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A895E7F4-B674-4AEB-88C4-8D5C15069C95@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12B411)
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 06:00:34 -0800
To: Andrew Allen <aallen@blackberry.com>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/47hDMSTGYtBnFi85U5ypZxUVhhU
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 14:00:53 -0000


> On Dec 6, 2014, at 05:06, Andrew Allen <aallen@blackberry.com> wrote:
> 
> But I think my point was clear. Several significant players in the browser space that are supposed to implement the video MTI...

Well, there's "supposed to" and then there's "plan to."

https://status.modern.ie/?term=WebRTC%20v1.0

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email