Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec

David Singer <singer@apple.com> Sat, 06 December 2014 01:58 UTC

Return-Path: <singer@apple.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9CA1A1BD1 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 17:58:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j8Uzf-_JCwoA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 17:58:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-in5.apple.com (mail-out5.apple.com [17.151.62.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 994E21A00B7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 17:58:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=apple.com; s=mailout2048s; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@apple.com; t=1417831137; x=2281744737; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-id:To:Cc:MIME-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-reply-to:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=40uSRtfB97L/u4ZQ7pAtjI1Hof1/ldqQtocKOLp3rpU=; b=V6kebH/qtwjSKi2iP7L5QUIZ/kmYrvXv8Ka/yH7AEnXnCPDyRd8+6v1SbS8uQ7Xz ZZ2tN/b019Pt+an1mN5CJT5OrbvQYtdQVx4CWmS0I8eg5Z9Jf4vYo67q8MEfaVgF VjmpkABJYyhILZ064miF1m44eg+dZFwuuJg/D9NWknS2GHgXdx/XprW53dejrDlB 4lig8s0eeQt1L0Er17nmtDwRkWIXmtJLucCKSDHg1chXPcps0fGufGL2kFTiu42b EYbbChL1OgqGZnUS0WWKjWEHTUKbEQYXEHWXmvKtxtdvwcBpoWrz19JzRulT/ijr /Oza7p5d3Tl+0ZRPOO4v3g==;
Received: from relay4.apple.com (relay4.apple.com [17.128.113.87]) by mail-in5.apple.com (Apple Secure Mail Relay) with SMTP id 11.FC.06819.1E262845; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 17:58:57 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 11973e13-f79656d000001aa3-fd-548262e1295f
Received: from chicory.apple.com (chicory.apple.com [17.128.115.99]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay4.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 09.34.05998.1F262845; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 17:59:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [17.153.27.20] (unknown [17.153.27.20]) by chicory.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.30.0 64bit (built Oct 22 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NG5004X71I58030@chicory.apple.com> for rtcweb@ietf.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 17:58:56 -0800 (PST)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <548260D2.2020703@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 17:58:53 -0800
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <A5667955-21FC-4596-A86A-0902408BCC12@apple.com>
References: <E3FA0C72-48C5-465E-AE15-EB19D8D563A7@ieca.com> <54820E74.90201@mozilla.com> <FCDCD184-549C-4111-ACDB-7C466A2EE9D1@apple.com> <548260D2.2020703@nostrum.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrALMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FAYrvswqSnEYPtMRou1/9rZHRg9liz5 yRTAGMVlk5Kak1mWWqRvl8CV8eZ0P1PBB66KLfOPsDYwXuPoYuTkkBAwkbi47xQzhC0mceHe ejYQW0hgL6PEnx/pMDU9E78DxbmA4v1MEreu32GFc9qWHwbq5uBgFlCXmDIlF6SBV0BPounJ YyaQsLCArcTW60EgYTYBVYkHc44xgticAtoS8+7dZQexWYDiKw7PYAKxmQWsJP6efsIIYWtL PHl3gRVipI3EqtmroG5Ywyhx5DjEoSICihJth29CPSAr8e/iGXaQIgmBl6wS/w8+Y5rAKDwL 4bxZSM6bhWTHAkbmVYxCuYmZObqZeaZ6iQUFOal6yfm5mxhBQTzdTngH4+lVVocYBTgYlXh4 V0g0hgixJpYVV+YeYpTmYFES5022bwoREkhPLEnNTk0tSC2KLyrNSS0+xMjEwSnVwLhS4ded Z7kPY7+r//KVDcm8XRKVaCnNd/umftiV601OBh3iV9fkxWv/df/EZaz+xe/nD5b+K+95eDc0 Kiy5Hsro/1mX7ddpl+npX0/V7vrOk/z4sA7DhDLJbb1vK2pykx8IiFekrrsj9OCGyPkPvBWF EdLWPV+LqjxNFdr0T3Levu7s/MY8WImlOCPRUIu5qDgRAL8+fdRDAgAA
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrCLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FCcrPsxqSnE4PJnfYu1/9rZHRg9liz5 yRTAGMVlk5Kak1mWWqRvl8CV8eZ0P1PBB66KLfOPsDYwXuPoYuTkkBAwkeiZ+J0NwhaTuHBv PZDNxSEk0M8kcev6HVY4p235YeYuRg4OZgF1iSlTckEaeAX0JJqePGYCCQsL2EpsvR4EEmYT UJV4MOcYI4jNKaAtMe/eXXYQmwUovuLwDCYQm1nASuLv6SeMELa2xJN3F1ghRtpIrJq9CuqG NYwSR46vBztOREBRou3wTWaIQ2Ul/l08wz6BUWAWwkWzkFw0C8nYBYzMqxgFilJzEitN9BIL CnJS9ZLzczcxgsOuMHwH479lVocYBTgYlXh4V0g0hgixJpYVV+YeYpTgYFYS4U2eDRTiTUms rEotyo8vKs1JLT7EKM3BoiTO2/wOKCWQnliSmp2aWpBaBJNl4uCUamAU3hnXm3LtXr7s4/Xz nNnevunjaOoQSW5rkT98/MLsZ9I29fsWJ9Rf6+q7snfhky9WP4+8dGNbunxnH9fV9ELGPkbJ i2+u3atlv7tr0YKv5y7MNNz+0Hy/eKZSU8KRmbmnw10M/opXfGdMX2r76PWnl+YO/qrCJ1Yw vVB5aCg5+cXDO28uFC53UGIpzkg01GIuKk4EAAE/baY3AgAA
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/zq7ND8fnHlJhMdLerptBjWE2PFo
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 01:58:58 -0000

> On Dec 5, 2014, at 17:50 , Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> On 12/5/14 15:26, David Singer wrote:
>>> On Dec 5, 2014, at 11:58 , Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@mozilla.com> wrote:
>>> 3) This is the only proposal that gets support from both camps
>> if you could speak only for yourself, and not others, that might be better.  You’re claiming support by other people here.
>> 
> 
> If I read Jean-Marc's statement correctly, it's not speaking on behalf of other people; it's using what they have already said, on the record [1], as a valid part of his rationale.
> 
> I'd like to reinforce this sentiment. I support this proposal not because I think it is the best solution, but because it is the first MTI video codec proposal that the actual implementors in this technology space have even remotely agreed on since the discussion began. I support this proposal primarily because it is the only solution we have yet seen that has a credible chance of succeeding.

OK, we are potential implementor, and so are Blackberry, and we don’t agree. 

You seem to hypothesize two camps only and that this has support of both. You are therefore trying to claim a state of consensus which does not exist.  There was pushback both in the room and on the list.


David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.