Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec

"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Tue, 09 December 2014 06:09 UTC

Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D6C91A1EF3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 22:09:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lQtGJpkIHlIK for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 22:09:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scintmta01-14.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta01-14.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB281A1C04 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 22:09:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scmeg01-14.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scmeg01-14.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.15]) by scintmta01-14.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E8932E56F; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:08:45 +0900 (JST)
Received: from itmail2.it.aoyama.ac.jp (unknown [133.2.206.134]) by scmeg01-14.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 34c8_2e58_a7507f15_bc77_4ba7_a68e_81485fe96e14; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 15:08:45 +0900
Received: from [133.2.210.64] (unknown [133.2.210.64]) by itmail2.it.aoyama.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A27BF544; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:08:45 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <548691EB.30600@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 15:08:43 +0900
From: =?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
References: <E3FA0C72-48C5-465E-AE15-EB19D8D563A7@ieca.com> <5485CC5B.2030104@alvestrand.no> <CABkgnnV4vhxBAQzr3BcL78uk+fSGi9DNvG=9XfdUsQekpWp5FA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-3NbwmnU0eaZNzEQB4N8HxQjF61HgvOeMqVmA=uoLQ_TA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHp8n2=PZdsMJFqEDpuo11xAAMtx_vjtL5SU-wMMei6tbKw3YA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHp8n2=PZdsMJFqEDpuo11xAAMtx_vjtL5SU-wMMei6tbKw3YA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/5ViNINYIoJognKGa85zMmu5T4rw
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 06:09:40 -0000

+1.   Regards,   Martin.

On 2014/12/09 05:17, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
> I wasn't at the meeting, but I too support the compromise. It's non
> optimal, but pragmatic and all that's achievable in the given circumstances.
>
> Best Regards,
> Silvia.
> On 9 Dec 2014 04:40, "Justin Uberti" <juberti@google.com> wrote:
>
>> I support the rough consensus as presented by the chair.
>>
>> As stated before - I think this plan represents a legitimate compromise
>> in what had previously seemed like a stalemate. While not my ideal outcome,
>> I think this is good for the WebRTC ecosystem - it ensures
>> interoperability, and provides a reasonably clear path for reaching a
>> completely RF solution.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 8 December 2014 at 08:05, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Since others who were present in the room are repeating their position
>>>> on the list, I'll do so too.
>>>
>>> That's probably a good thing to do.  An almost anonymous humming sound
>>> isn't a good basis for establishing a record.
>>>
>>>> I support the rough consensus as presented by the chair.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rtcweb mailing list
>>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>