IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec

David Singer <singer@apple.com> Fri, 12 December 2014 23:33 UTC

Return-Path: <singer@apple.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8A01A0025 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:33:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WhpVS1VMuODx for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:33:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-in5.apple.com (mail-out5.apple.com [17.151.62.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E4381A000D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:33:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=apple.com; s=mailout2048s; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@apple.com; t=1418427222; x=2282340822; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-id:To:Cc:MIME-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-reply-to:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=6kf78Qa3LP+oqFFlwV2MAZ3kVeSqU3fqfWEqqDB80OQ=; b=EAgDqvLz9Vhjbsn4cWh0P+Ts5+2P0kMGQ389pITl95HnUUlAXgj+lzu7kxr93kIu 3djslD2pbCocV6u5X0ERbduSIMlHQp5zjTiKXbYmLbqEadV/FYRCzQNR3zwvX52e wnStpjHg/U0F++4shH+mfVRu0u6ryOLTI4VzEcOs9pMJA5XH0sCTPZGeuJKggaOJ p31groOxMhW4W8SmQI6l5VOHbjIyEY35raGg36t3T7nz5lq9IXUWGvhPL8G8T8g0 XJAS0kOIqJHNZhqd8HUmFkaDsZ8QoTgbq1WEFee6g0uwk2lBjva1aGLs6b+YwPtk QafvtpPZxmdzdndcXOZylg==;
Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com [17.128.113.83]) by mail-in5.apple.com (Apple Secure Mail Relay) with SMTP id 39.28.06819.65B7B845; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:33:42 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 11973e13-f79656d000001aa3-26-548b7b56dc6c
Received: from marigold.apple.com (marigold.apple.com [17.128.115.132]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay3.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id C6.06.05439.C5B7B845; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:33:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from singda.apple.com (singda.apple.com [17.201.24.241]) by marigold.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.30.0 64bit (built Oct 22 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NGH00B06TG5LJ70@marigold.apple.com> for rtcweb@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:33:41 -0800 (PST)
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <548B047F.9090704@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:33:41 -0800
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <56448CBD-FB31-4468-B449-497652FCAAEB@apple.com>
References: <E3FA0C72-48C5-465E-AE15-EB19D8D563A7@ieca.com> <CALiegfmuO6m=FfSQ9b9i_cu+_0eUSbxTtMh0_9kNCk9BLf-iuA@mail.gmail.com> <548AD22D.7040104@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <548AFB1A.1040405@andyet.net> <548AFF76.1010003@nostrum.com> <CALiegfmH6hWp6nuArv8YyPcgq6SCd9x-dU0cxAaKJLrmb0hc_g@mail.gmail.com> <548B047F.9090704@nostrum.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FAYrBtW3R1iMGcev8Xaf+3sDoweS5b8 ZApgjOKySUnNySxLLdK3S+DKODx5F3PBW7aKk+8uszcwHmDtYuTgkBAwkTg2I7qLkRPIFJO4 cG89WxcjF4eQwF5GiR2zT7JDJIBqFn1khEhMYpK4P+0YlDOfSeLG1h2MIJOYBdQlpkzJBWng FdCTaHrymAkkLCxgK7H1ehBImE1AVeLBnGNg1ZwC2hIXFzKBhFmAwvuWTWAFsZmBwk/eXWCF mGIjcfDaG1aITeeYJL6ePsUIkhAB2nT54QWo22Ql/l08ww5SJCHwkFXi3tN3rBMYhWYhXDQL yUWzkOxYwMi8ilEoNzEzRzczz1QvsaAgJ1UvOT93EyMoVKfbCe9gPL3K6hCjAAejEg/vi9Su ECHWxLLiytxDjNIcLErivMvcukOEBNITS1KzU1MLUovii0pzUosPMTJxcEo1MPI/3Hv9A9eE FsWbVraht7zOLvB5+1LcOPG4mjnjs9vbd1RMWDX1vEdJ9v2yVP8lquoGJ5+uEXuQyap2YdPl XSI/0s5MPBCWbrfBytqoPqnZ2SG20vsGw8vLd7cbJM807MrJq6nTv+1m06ggUHD6dUzSioSP nTJFe5u9ZuabW6kIKd/RP1jZo8RSnJFoqMVcVJwIAHhAnGE2AgAA
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprOLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FDcohtT3R1icG0Hr8Xaf+3sDoweS5b8 ZApgjOKySUnNySxLLdK3S+DKODx5F3PBW7aKk+8uszcwHmDtYuTkkBAwkTi26CMjhC0mceHe erYuRi4OIYFJTBL3px1jhHDmM0nc2LoDyOHgYBZQl5gyJRekgVdAT6LpyWMmkLCwgK3E1utB IGE2AVWJB3OOgVVzCmhLXFzIBBJmAQrvWzYBbC0zUPjJuwusEFNsJA5ee8MKsekck8TX06fA 7hEB2nT54QV2iNtkJf5dPMM+gZF/FsIRs5AcMQvJ2AWMzKsYBYpScxIrjfUSCwpyUvWS83M3 MYKDqzB4B+OfZVaHGAU4GJV4eCckd4UIsSaWFVfmHmKU4GBWEuG1FO8OEeJNSaysSi3Kjy8q zUktPsQozcGiJM5b8a4xREggPbEkNTs1tSC1CCbLxMEp1cDI9uxe6MWZStMeWflPUL+a8OWs 4rRUa+HP+it+aE9u2rt998Uot451k/76LN3/dWWfxIYKgaCKIFbdf3LM5yW2rmnTujvdRPOX 2jkdO763fv6K75/kPbuk9WjtcfktydKvAg7+dZH7PaHsbpfCbn+JFIUXpo6z+r+x8nS+5lC4 +PjfvLiHu3IKlFiKMxINtZiLihMBZ7+hNyoCAAA=
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/hI4ImA1CuTjxPklSgzqvzr4nd9Y
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 23:33:43 -0000

> On Dec 12, 2014, at 7:06 , Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> On 12/12/14 08:57, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>> IMHO the door should remain open for, at least, the inclusion of a new 100% RF video codec.
> 
> Then you already have what you want: there's no way we could close that door, no matter how hard we tried.

Quite.  I rather suspect that stating “If the situation changes, we may change this specification” is stating the obvious.  These forward-looking statements don’t seem to inform implementations, or constrain or de-constrain the group. I am unclear as to what purpose they serve.

As a humorist once remarked, “what am I supposed to do about road-side signs that warn of low-flying aircraft? take my hat off?”


David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email