IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec

"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Fri, 05 December 2014 19:59 UTC

Return-Path: <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7AD41AD8E3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 11:59:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id duAzn5NyZtmH for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 11:59:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54A5A1A00E8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 11:59:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 934BBDF847812; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 19:59:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712wxchhub03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.74]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id sB5JxLEl020168 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 5 Dec 2014 20:59:21 +0100
Received: from FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.7.25]) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 20:59:21 +0100
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec
Thread-Index: AQHQEJCGOxi9wNotXUawuapxE0F0cpyBT4OAgAAT+DA=
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 19:59:20 +0000
Message-ID: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B28DBE8@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <E3FA0C72-48C5-465E-AE15-EB19D8D563A7@ieca.com> <548205C7.3090805@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <548205C7.3090805@nostrum.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.38]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/kJt_FtcwHM3CRO125T03Ba4t5y0
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 19:59:25 -0000

In that case you are agreeing with something that did not happen. By no stretch of the imagination can the result of the RTCWEB session be declared as "consensus".

The chairman declared "rough consensus" in the room, which is an entirely different concept.

Keith 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adam Roach
> Sent: 05 December 2014 19:22
> To: Sean Turner; rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec
> 
> On 12/5/14 05:36, Sean Turner wrote:
> > After the discussion, some clarifying questions about the 
> hums, and typing the hum questions on the screen, there was 
> rough consensus in the room to add (aka "shove") the proposed 
> text into draft-ietf-rtcweb-video.  In keeping with IETF 
> process, I am confirming this consensus call on the list.
> 
> I believe it should go without saying, but I agree with the 
> room consensus.
> 
> /a
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email