Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec

cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> Tue, 09 December 2014 18:44 UTC

Return-Path: <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CACB1A1A2F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:44:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JXlI0rme62_R for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:44:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f171.google.com (mail-ie0-f171.google.com [209.85.223.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E95F1A8A78 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:44:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id rl12so1111935iec.30 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:44:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XInpzuTIBMbxgUA7fEVY46elciJa74+cnpO6fccaqV8=; b=I8QFGieejWjdVECj2J8wZ3UYwFaqs1tCNISioUeu4VQYmO9oUqoEuXss2yFenv6DV3 wfkd/BQyJnik4DPMizbm81ETDwXIRIXmolBbFCYplNBoDsobS7sGD7y/NYRfPW7ZiNwP R2Z3ZD2NWIpnTtaZtZ6OneOilHNhYkWAFtjDZK+shZg2V5Ebfsx6hDmML29Jrt5izG1E FvDQgVl1qz8aNykDEjOVq+IuBFxaSWtWelmZ2s6KabzDNNDsBkK0FVcWifA60VMqAAM1 fK1Ooo/U8Id1LaeKHtOavqjeG0CGZdnk831M5hoiiNyWV4UQuQ1dICO2aVQQoQk/V9D+ iytA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQktOCOV+uGPWs5rJM3w3mq5rhf7O/HmuEAFqkMi+vZsiRE+rLSQcJloPXy3kbgvLflLd2pZ
X-Received: by 10.107.15.226 with SMTP id 95mr18083898iop.12.1418150692849; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:44:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (206-248-171-209.dsl.teksavvy.com. [206.248.171.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jg3sm5864862igb.12.2014.12.09.10.44.52 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:44:52 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <548742E7.40600@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 13:43:51 -0500
From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <E3FA0C72-48C5-465E-AE15-EB19D8D563A7@ieca.com> <CACrD=+9AA3SUiMKA4J9KjKvmwYBFeMXw-tQWJoR_KS6-DHqNdA@mail.gmail.com> <54872804.9090700@bbs.darktech.org>
In-Reply-To: <54872804.9090700@bbs.darktech.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/xBqf5PbgpXFwg6BkmoqYNOMF78s
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 18:44:55 -0000

It has come to my attention that I misunderstood the chair proposal. I 
was under the impression that non-browsers were still given the option 
of only implementing one MTI (this was an older proposal).

In light of this, I am withdrawing my support for the compromise as 
presented by the chair. I plan to abstain on this decision.

Thank you,
Gili

On 09/12/2014 11:49 AM, cowwoc wrote:
> Hi Harald,
>
> I am in favor of the compromise as presented by the chair.
>
> (I also second Victor Pascual Avila's suggestion to revisit this 
> decision for browsers as well as non-browsers in the future should 
> anything of substance change.)
>
> Gili
>
> On 09/12/2014 4:44 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>> I note that the "confirming sense of the room" thread has gotten a lot
>> of messages that are not declaring a position on the question.
>>
>> I also note that from the messages on the thread, I can't figure out if
>> Keith Drage, Gili, Monty Montgomery or Peter Saint-Andre have taken a
>> position (I could guess, but I don't want to - besides, they might not
>> want to take a position, which is perfectly OK).
>>
>> It would be nice for me as a reader if people could:
>>
>> - state their position on the "confirming sense of the room" thread
>> - change the subject line when they want to say anything else
>>
>> That's my preference - of course, people who have "mute thread" in their
>> email readers might want the whole discussion to stay on thread, and
>> will hate me for the last suggestion....
>>
>> Harald
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>