Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec

[cowwoc <[e-mail]>]

It has come to my attention that I misunderstood the chair proposal. I 
was under the impression that non-browsers were still given the option 
of only implementing one MTI (this was an older proposal).

In light of this, I am withdrawing my support for the compromise as 
presented by the chair. I plan to abstain on this decision.

Thank you,
Gili

On 09/12/2014 11:49 AM, cowwoc wrote:
> Hi Harald,
>
> I am in favor of the compromise as presented by the chair.
>
> (I also second Victor Pascual Avila's suggestion to revisit this 
> decision for browsers as well as non-browsers in the future should 
> anything of substance change.)
>
> Gili
>
> On 09/12/2014 4:44 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>> I note that the "confirming sense of the room" thread has gotten a lot
>> of messages that are not declaring a position on the question.
>>
>> I also note that from the messages on the thread, I can't figure out if
>> Keith Drage, Gili, Monty Montgomery or Peter Saint-Andre have taken a
>> position (I could guess, but I don't want to - besides, they might not
>> want to take a position, which is perfectly OK).
>>
>> It would be nice for me as a reader if people could:
>>
>> - state their position on the "confirming sense of the room" thread
>> - change the subject line when they want to say anything else
>>
>> That's my preference - of course, people who have "mute thread" in their
>> email readers might want the whole discussion to stay on thread, and
>> will hate me for the last suggestion....
>>
>> Harald
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>