Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec

David Singer <singer@apple.com> Sun, 07 December 2014 01:41 UTC

Return-Path: <singer@apple.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88731A6F6D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 17:41:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id igsRjCiutn7M for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 17:41:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-in7.apple.com (mail-out7.apple.com [17.151.62.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D40CE1A6F62 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 17:41:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=apple.com; s=mailout2048s; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@apple.com; t=1417916517; x=2281830117; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-id:To:Cc:MIME-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-reply-to:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=WdHkHlVrs5EXSDFHrfbk6yNOxfEI4XU0nNjzB/tfgZo=; b=S1VhoNpRhYbVpnzw63f1UqSeqV5fvIv7Cuclmeei4TRZgaz7p5Q7RFtYl/tENgKv OAy7lyE0U/8LqoMc9hgRMpp68eN2n2VEoWhG0ULT1iQdAVWQVOAGU6oT7QXQhFT3 pE1wVIS2YZ6Rn+GDbEvCvQQfOjYjsl3GKZM3rXcD8Ue5a/eykGRYE0VEHDoapsBY wHBHmFWw0725cdnH0j3oYU9Rof+rEKKYR9UHxFP5moXZQIa5n+irPijz2Q/dZYhu Bo/tqC6E9hVGL1fMVyafKDm3fs3wVIOnnbsu1Wu86oL605CTYY4URRbekK6zBOb4 iXq0gnSKNCGeS8mPtOmlDw==;
Received: from relay4.apple.com (relay4.apple.com [17.128.113.87]) by mail-in7.apple.com (Apple Secure Mail Relay) with SMTP id 9C.08.09658.560B3845; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 17:41:57 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 11973e16-f79aa6d0000025ba-50-5483b065163c
Received: from cilantro.apple.com (cilantro.apple.com [17.128.115.18]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay4.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 92.9E.05998.670B3845; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 17:42:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [17.153.102.23] (unknown [17.153.102.23]) by cilantro.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.30.0 64bit (built Oct 22 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NG600AI7VDWV640@cilantro.apple.com> for rtcweb@ietf.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2014 17:41:57 -0800 (PST)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <5483755A.4070806@nostrum.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 17:41:56 -0800
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <68056FA8-8B28-41E5-815A-A1BAA048F190@apple.com>
References: <E3FA0C72-48C5-465E-AE15-EB19D8D563A7@ieca.com> <54820E74.90201@mozilla.com> <FCDCD184-549C-4111-ACDB-7C466A2EE9D1@apple.com> <548260D2.2020703@nostrum.com> <A5667955-21FC-4596-A86A-0902408BCC12@apple.com> <5483755A.4070806@nostrum.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrHLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FAYrpu6oTnE4Ow2EYu1/9rZHRg9liz5 yRTAGMVlk5Kak1mWWqRvl8CV0bpjB1vBNLaKr7f8Ghh/sHQxcnBICJhI/Dnj08XICWSKSVy4 t56ti5GLQ0hgL6PEzsVr4WpOL1WDiE9kkvh6bwdU0WQmif/zHrOBFDELqEtMmZILMohXQE+i 6cljJpCwsICtxNbrQSBhNgFViQdzjjGC2JwC2hI3Zy4As1mA4q8mz2AGsZkFrCT+nn7CCGFr Szx5d4EVYqSNxLZFh1gg1v5jlDhw+i4bSEJEQFGi7fBNZogHZCX+XTzDDlIkIfCRVWL7myam CYzCsxDOm4XkvFlIdixgZF7FKJSbmJmjm5lnrpdYUJCTqpecn7uJERTA0+3EdjA+XGV1iFGA g1GJh7ejuClEiDWxrLgy9xCjNAeLkjhvsj1QSCA9sSQ1OzW1ILUovqg0J7X4ECMTB6dUA+MG rUjzea7R//I4bTwnV81QTtsyUY2hQkgqyn9mn9rs8Nc/tm/fqGv73fMRu++GC8yMfI8+8IY4 vHbbHCH9dO7p1y+Mpl819zxz7uCnRI6s3QY9d4svry8wbGdLi4pbs+vw1V1ql67JeW6blyXT 9uNM4SGJgkvND5lCm4wmZ25y4zLv9H+71UGJpTgj0VCLuag4EQD/CqqrQQIAAA==
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrELMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FAspFu2oTnE4PMiAYu1/9rZHRg9liz5 yRTAGMVlk5Kak1mWWqRvl8CV0bpjB1vBNLaKr7f8Ghh/sHQxcnBICJhInF6q1sXICWSKSVy4 t56ti5GLQ0hgIpPE13s7oJzJTBL/5z1mA2lgFlCXmDIlF6SBV0BPounJYyaQsLCArcTW60Eg YTYBVYkHc44xgticAtoSN2cuALNZgOKvJs9gBrGZBawk/p5+wghha0s8eXeBFWKkjcS2RYdY INb+Y5Q4cPouG0hCREBRou3wTWaIQ2Ul/l08wz6BUWAWwkWzkFw0C8nYBYzMqxgFilJzEitN 9BILCnJS9ZLzczcxgkOuMHwH479lVocYBTgYlXh4O4ubQoRYE8uKK3MPMUpwMCuJ8K4Ubg4R 4k1JrKxKLcqPLyrNSS0+xCjNwaIkztv8rjFESCA9sSQ1OzW1ILUIJsvEwSnVwKh96a/p332z lvoYpq3LuSIVlqH8iquh46ZC47eYXvv2zvXBTy0d2Pg+fal7wcq5/MzE7f+3rPCxP6e5xjZr TVZTk2m2vvadT0LWjH6Tk5gZ/p7+HVJ1jDNuLv9T+6cfHk9S4jBObjm6cHNn58eFqZqKTYe/ MWwN4WS9eu1etVYn/7LX+2/uMlBiKc5INNRiLipOBACcYUcKNQIAAA==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/DlvapsQvHdhOp9r5rqrH0RY_ctA
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] confirming sense of the room: mti codec
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 01:41:59 -0000

Adam

we are at cross purposes.  I am complaining about a language usage.  When you say “both camps support” you imply (a) that there are only two camps, and everyone is a member of one or other and (b) that they have reached agreement — and therefore we are done. Perhaps you don’t mean it, but it’s a technique some people use to try to give the appearance of an agreement, and given the sensitive nature of the subject, I’d prefer you not do that.

If you say “there was support for the position from several camps”, or somesuch, that would be fine. That leaves room for people to say that they dissent, that’s all.

Got it?

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.