Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 27 February 2021 19:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450973A12FB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 11:32:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0r_BtMSEo5Bs for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 11:32:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D4A43A12FC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 11:32:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF33F389C1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 14:36:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id UmyrHyDO6ItF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 14:36:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D913C389BF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 14:36:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF28D63E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 14:32:27 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: document writing/editing tools used by IETF
In-Reply-To: <20210227190200.06ED46F10439@ary.qy>
References: <20210227190200.06ED46F10439@ary.qy>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 14:32:27 -0500
Message-ID: <4064.1614454347@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3UDT4Apb7qzFHmVg3MvrYOGeUb8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 19:32:33 -0000

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
    > I agree that neither mailing lists nor github are ideal for the way the
    > IETF works today but I would be very unhappy if we invented yet another
    > bespoke locally maintained bunch of software.

That's true.

    > We're strange but it's hard to imagine that we're so strange that there
    > isn't an existing package somewhere that will do the job either as is
    > or with minor customization.

You are stating this completely backwards.
We aren't strange, we are brilliant, and it's hard for others to understand
our needsd.

There were in fact, existing tools when we started: they were airplanes and hotels,
but we were strange, and we wanted to access remote computers without travel,
so we invented Telnet.  For many industries, they have stuck to travel up to
and including the beginning of the pandemic.  Many senior executives had
never used teleconference before the pandemic for instance: people came to them.

That bespoke system wasn't for everyone, so in the 1990s, some people outside
of the IETF, at a science laboratory turned built our "FTP" protocol into
HTTP+WWW, which we then took over the world as the way to access remote
computation.

People keep saying that our bespoke tools are somehow backwards, and that
other people have done a better job.  But it's almost always the opposite in
my opinion.

Our bespoke tools lead the way for others.  We know what we want, and we know
how our technology can be used to deliver it.   Others don't, so they
re-invent things over and over and over again.

We did this with Jabber+Audio, and then video streams for remote meetings,
and there were a dozen immitators.  They couldn't figure out cross-platform,
couldn't anticipate mobile devices and chromebooks and TVs with Internet
connections. Some even spread malware due to lack of "Security
Considerations", so we did our own based upon webrtc.

Now everyone does webrtc: but the other tools still regularly fail to provide
the right integrations.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide