Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 23 February 2021 22:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D7473A0E1F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:40:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CBk29FWDrdSD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:40:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CA5E3A0E1E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:40:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id g1so63733ljj.13 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:40:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=e7292WfIvWtKAW/4EJoUcGmlBa2DMKg+u55td5ZKix8=; b=evR9aJ9hdBgqUkhdBqvaE4s65yDiChgHPV3Snnv66ybyTc7UVUONFIh7RrQmBrgmwL 5TX0vn+Ym5fGmwY1HBPluSYcJJtk+8hmGIUqfkiXI7jJiyf0pPpXRgCyiAfkPH+u0Cwj PXoMH/kb+G22WG3vDaEHRDUKanf9cLnCX4YWOyvDlmgbwES7GgvtAoopVdM1bQd3bJ8X QffNJmc3qGJGHdk2dhWkvBzTutLJc8hHbtSlrZFJVEEVVjQXDcvfLq8wfZ0Q4cd8gKAy p6u2zj/2XO924W8XspEImul9y0WcX7pYU6HV6oP1Wvn+rnAlGnHjqZ185wHTXducL7RD S2bg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=e7292WfIvWtKAW/4EJoUcGmlBa2DMKg+u55td5ZKix8=; b=aonXq8Zkuw6Xbm27M4/UFK0JNqsK1dH6K5U0YMbIbtC3rrXakbGnFEoiU3PaGrcnPA kdJ+clru3NUxn/gibC9a63sNlkiWE7DvypX9V5iQmpNgO9pXJPutPGaSY0tq8Kysbaw4 nG9y0HJksyJ+aTKNi33FVps8Ll+tJEBmRywVk3XAU2sFJUpelDg2xpQMJMWlY/DuZ0Wf oVKZl9DFcF+hHUNinlwLWda3KQMVYhpjxf1pYZNyywCOnu5zpzdtNSG8eHYvn62X6I4n 6RKzzo0kBFP0hjsge8iZhqCyn8TfLLlBHukf602WMxxHahYrSPywLvb90RTWJ++9uQvO 70OA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530sRakDCwu9rr+BEFrsVqyuYYGN3PSPRJApVVuICpkW0plp/LX8 asn+j6ufDYnpg/PFUA8WvAWPA6wVfa8Qrulv1hcn9g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzMMpX83p+orvPA2LgfJbHi927rCz6BCa+Wfqhht7MO8FgYHhHCgtto38RiNF8N8gHZs24Gr2CLyi5CyhoqEm8=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9c12:: with SMTP id s18mr16563188lji.383.1614120000321; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:40:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <37eecb9b-f0eb-e21c-b162-b1f0339e4981@si6networks.com> <3c2d646d-f18d-4d88-b458-29dbd486432b@beta.fastmail.com> <AM0PR08MB371669108E9CEA561BEC9EF6FA809@AM0PR08MB3716.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <d6648437-332b-4668-a1c7-591f2c287539@dogfood.fastmail.com> <CADNypP8GKTY-Jhpb6AEfcpXOihwLap7OrrByNemGc2GNvZLeog@mail.gmail.com> <10fd9d2d-afb4-44aa-b618-fb5ce1efa69e@dogfood.fastmail.com> <c21477c8f68047cabac7aeae60a688f2@cert.org> <CAHbuEH7Qvc3AaBxbk1kXd4knS4_+Wrs3P7WNETRNNoFP-dGNCA@mail.gmail.com> <A59DA7B8-8573-4AAE-A888-7B186DED956B@mnot.net> <CADNypP-NdUVtn60A_XHg3dOCFn4D=kYyc8C1ucZ5PK5_OOTPOw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADNypP-NdUVtn60A_XHg3dOCFn4D=kYyc8C1ucZ5PK5_OOTPOw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:39:24 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBP_rQVJetNk8K5VmvWHoDE8A3nWwLDUiYN2U9dJJ6shhg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF
To: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003e85cc05bc0899e2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/VaL0NKPvG_ejB_3v1WcG6YEre68>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 22:40:05 -0000

Replying to Rifaat's e-mail but not replying to him specifically.

Hi folks,

I don't think the question of whether OAuth is a good or bad WG group is
really a productive one in general, and it's especially hard for me to see
how it's going to let us make progress on questions of DEI. This seems like
precisely the kind of thing that's going to lead to a bunch of hard
feelings without making progress. I think we can all agree that the IETF
culture isn't perfect and that there are cases where we make it hard for
new people to get involved, so maybe we could focus instead on those
aspects of our culture.

I would suggest that if people have problems with the way the OAuth WG is
being run they ought to take it up with the AD (Roman Danyliw), or, failing
that, on the IETF list.

-Ekr




On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 2:12 PM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 4:57 PM Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > On 24 Feb 2021, at 2:20 am, Kathleen Moriarty <
>> kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> [...]
>> > And way back when I was AD, OAuth was by far the most productive
>> working group I managed.  They put out what felt like about 3 documents a
>> meeting for full publication.  I was the AD for 3 years, ending in 2017
>> when EKR became an AD.
>> >
>> > There was a bit of management as a result of the number of experts and
>> varying use cases for their environments, but even with that, OAuth was
>> very productive.  Since your document was 2016, I was likely the AD.  Yes,
>> the meetings had challenges at times, but we worked through it and things
>> got done.
>>
>> Measuring productivity through the number of documents published is not a
>> good habit for us to get into;
>
>
> The number of documents published was in response to a comment that
> "nothing would get done" at the OAuth WG. Which is clearly not true.
>
>
>> it gives incentive to all of the wrong kinds of behaviours.
>
>
> Can you elaborate on these wrong behaviours?
>
> Regards,
>  Rifaat
>
>
>> Having some success metrics for our work has come up in the IAB a few
>> times, but we haven't made much progress.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>