Re: HTML for email

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Mon, 01 March 2021 23:27 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C34B3A24E3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 15:27:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QHRgkv7qH5zD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 15:27:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from donkey.ash.relay.mailchannels.net (donkey.ash.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.222.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1808E3A24E2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 15:27:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA6C7813F8; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 23:27:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a86.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-16-25.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.16.25]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F2FD378146D; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 23:27:32 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a86.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 100.96.16.25 (trex/6.0.2); Mon, 01 Mar 2021 23:27:33 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Wipe-Celery: 63d9908d5293bcd6_1614641253246_2613584173
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1614641253245:978386646
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1614641253245
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a86.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a86.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6ED17EF9C; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 15:27:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; s= cryptonector.com; bh=/5lRynacpIrrx904uFcNoJ2ngwg=; b=A6K5hfdyc4J BrIrNE5HgkQAGqP0nM87rIxevsWwBloLzQCR/QGgLaUO44zDJ0KSYCMBQK9I1rP+ jlgXdPfldaSnhAzY2lC6khyATl5YcNE0ad+luTjwBu58Z6jLigNeTgwxuF2361Rf YlTHXTtleCjLO2TlQ0KJYzxYFlWyns+I=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a86.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4B947E52C; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 15:27:30 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 17:27:28 -0600
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a86
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: HTML for email
Message-ID: <20210301232708.GJ30153@localhost>
References: <20210227190200.06ED46F10439@ary.qy> <4064.1614454347@localhost> <s1f0vo$ejp$1@gal.iecc.com> <59240886-320d-fae3-6b98-7b83dacaf5e7@network-heretics.com> <CAMm+LwhWCsG68GOws-Zm9TDcEZ4trGBhq7Dm-_0Ci8Ri7kDK=Q@mail.gmail.com> <ecf84c57-97e4-e9ac-6836-4e61b654260c@network-heretics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ecf84c57-97e4-e9ac-6836-4e61b654260c@network-heretics.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/H5woViwUto_UFIeeOX8uY8p61Lc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 23:27:40 -0000

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 01:27:07PM -0500, Keith Moore wrote:
> In some sense, plain text works better for IETF's needs than HTML, and maybe
> plain text works better for the needs of anyone doing technical discussion
> over email.  There is some virtue in simplicity.    One of the virtues of
> plain text email is that there's not (much of) a layer of interpretation
> between the text in the message and what the recipient sees.   (Of course
> there is a layer - the character encoding scheme - but not much more than
> that.)

Plain text email in IETF participation works great for me.  Maybe that's
just because I use mutt and VIM.  Because it works great for me, I don't
want to give it up, and I look with suspicion on any proposals to
replace it.

I do like GitHub for some IETF work, but GitHub doesn't make it easy for
me to have a single interface to all the IETF repos I might want to
follow or contribute to, and that would be essential for GH to
supplement the email lists more.

I've seen large communities replace e-mail lists with web-based forum
type solutions, and I for one don't like any such that I've seen yet.

My 2c.