Re: HTML for email

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Tue, 02 March 2021 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679A53A19BC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 08:49:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v_hGvp7XuqXM for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 08:49:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bactrian.dogwood.relay.mailchannels.net (bactrian.dogwood.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.211.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15BBF3A19B5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 08:49:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888D13238BB; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 16:49:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a13.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-16-22.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.16.22]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 12A3E3239E4; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 16:49:24 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a13.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 100.96.16.22 (trex/6.0.2); Tue, 02 Mar 2021 16:49:24 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Good
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Relation-Harmony: 2d68dd0b21f50bcc_1614703764362_4290373624
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1614703764362:136747587
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1614703764362
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a13.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a13.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953EE7FE67; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 08:49:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=0K4yNioB2z5DJA R/nFbfyNzgjEU=; b=fsEwUjo86L/9B6agDNRxIY+C2TVy5hI/+yhoPw+hKbyX+P SbDzMt0C17CYj7L0wR5hZaUmeXk9+kfKh3h0K2JAeKUAXqn1tqlhE/NTU7u7WVJb 60fm8y5O1/1JAqPMPj7lC6+wWxas7gJPQiWxpaizNEh4X5JEbKn39kzciYNWo=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a13.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E06F87EE01; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 08:49:19 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 10:49:17 -0600
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a13
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com>
Cc: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>, ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: HTML for email
Message-ID: <20210302164916.GU30153@localhost>
References: <603D2360.1070406@btconnect.com> <20210301183401.GI21@kduck.mit.edu> <20210301232237.GI30153@localhost> <20210301233255.GM21@kduck.mit.edu> <603E08A1.1010406@btconnect.com> <01RW6LH8U8A4005PTU@mauve.mrochek.com> <d0da909a-7c55-5493-4c32-537a9cd2f968@foobar.org> <603E6847.8010608@btconnect.com> <42b4ee61-34f7-e495-2713-99d91751cf59@foobar.org> <603E6C2A.4040300@btconnect.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <603E6C2A.4040300@btconnect.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/LFPIJOXWb_BpERVQ48iIJlGIzdY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2021 16:49:27 -0000

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 04:47:38PM +0000, tom petch wrote:
> On 02/03/2021 16:41, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> > tom petch wrote on 02/03/2021 16:31:
> > > Strip it off before sending it out to list subscribers!
> > 
> > Great!  Is there an ID because some people may have an issue with this
> > and it's the sort of thing that might need consensus, given the
> > inconclusive discussion over the years.
> 
> I thought about an I-D
> text/html considered harmful
> but realised that I only know of the one clearcut privacy issue and that
> there are probably many more lurking there were I up-to-date with all that
> HTML is capable of nowadays.

Well, maybe if you publish a barebones I-D others will contribute
text...