IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Martin Duerst's responses (Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives)

"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Tue, 14 January 2014 11:10 UTC

Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43861AE0BB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 03:10:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.929
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.929 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RVZU3dWc2QyN for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 03:10:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B65A1AE0B4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 03:10:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.253.231]) by scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id s0EBA7c7009457; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 20:10:07 +0900
Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.134]) by scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 5669_6b44_6d506942_7d0c_11e3_8d3e_001e6722eec2; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 20:10:07 +0900
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [133.2.210.1]) by itmail2.it.aoyama.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A769BF54C; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 20:10:07 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <52D51AFA.9050909@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 20:09:46 +0900
From: "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
References: <CA+9kkMBSpDLJBBbPxgyMUi+bi3aw3D8zpSXcAvQ4koi115QqBg@mail.gmail.com> <52D280FF.5080503@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <52D51A29.1040207@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <52D51A29.1040207@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Martin Duerst's responses (Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:10:34 -0000

On 2014/01/14 20:06, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> On 01/12/2014 12:48 PM, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
>> Below are my opinions. I'm using a numerical with 0.0 meaning NO and
>> 1.0 meaning YES, everything in between is acceptable, with various
>> degrees.
>
> Martin, since you used neither 0.0 nor 1.0, I'm recording all your
> responses as ACCEPTABLE in my spreadsheet (not the official ones).

That's fine with me.    Regards,   Martin.

> If you don't want this, you'd better give some more instructions on how
> to interpret them.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email