[rtcweb] Paul Coverdale's response to Straw Poll (Was: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives)

cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> Wed, 08 January 2014 00:15 UTC

Return-Path: <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912C91AE24D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 16:15:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_71=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UcS__TDBcPgX for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 16:15:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com (mail-ig0-f174.google.com [209.85.213.174]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB001AE249 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 16:15:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hk11so11692574igb.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 16:14:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=/pWHzhqknX9+2f0pjVmp6ZedxLHpqBrEwXBFZYAyOtg=; b=U96XNg16myvrA7GVzV5d+Q9Zu6/jXFBVDK4nJa2aRkO1GZnRdXfY4XAd4CIZNREeA/ ljKaurPlGEZrSwgCIKJlyrHZI4VCHBuTw9yBPtjAqkNg8BGEiGAzknyzjTXqftHQwLM8 zlzlVch4SsNnWt8SwIKsRsHt6WhBUfrqYZwkdpVCFxs3MIsi8smwoPV23d8d86CU5flw HwFGLgUVOYxyJM1o9o3h4nik8SwUaowYVgbh8/qW71z2TIMiZhuVULlorguhMC9xQc0X VcUxqDKOngtp7jos7juGdkvjxuCyhMdCDoMBid3wBEfHoGVg6hUKjKSmFdMQIyXWfnXO InNA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmXsgZeBiIZ91BKulnwJd8OeqZLi+921J8w3bKIZaS8ufZ/sXWfurdbM7Sh86XHAX8Hshbs
X-Received: by 10.42.226.66 with SMTP id iv2mr86953534icb.11.1389140091310; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 16:14:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (206-248-171-209.dsl.teksavvy.com. [206.248.171.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d18sm6097314igz.0.2014.01.07.16.14.49 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Jan 2014 16:14:50 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52CC9877.7010004@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 19:14:47 -0500
From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CA+9kkMBSpDLJBBbPxgyMUi+bi3aw3D8zpSXcAvQ4koi115QqBg@mail.gmail.com> <BLU0-SMTP3886D2DDFD1FEE2A83BF0ED0B60@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BLU0-SMTP3886D2DDFD1FEE2A83BF0ED0B60@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050501030403020407010602"
Subject: [rtcweb] Paul Coverdale's response to Straw Poll (Was: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 00:15:02 -0000

Paul,

Care to elaborate on these last three responses? How do the first two 
fail to solve interoperability? And why do you feel that the 3rd option 
is "not a viable proposal"?

Thanks,
Gili

On 07/01/2014 5:49 PM, Paul Coverdale wrote:
> 14.All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264, Theora}
>
> a.Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *NO*
>
> b.Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize 
> them: *Doesn't solve interoperability*
>
> 15.All entities MUST support decoding using Theora.
>
> a.Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *NO*
>
> b.Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize 
> them: *Doesn't solve interoperability*
>
> 16.All entities MUST support Motion JPEG
>
> a.Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *NO*
>
> b.Do you have any objections to this option, if so please summarize 
> them: *Not a viable proposa*l
>
>