Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives

My views:
On 2013-12-09 18:24, Ted Hardie wrote:
>
>
> 1.
>
>     All entities MUST support H.264
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: Yes
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them:
>
> 2.
>
>     All entities MUST support VP8
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: Acceptable
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them: Will cause more interoperability problems with
>         other environmnets than H.264.
>
> 3.
>
>     All entities MUST support both H.264 and VP8
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: Acceptable
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them: More complex than plain H.264
>
> 4.
>
>     Browsers MUST support both H.264 and VP8, other entities MUST
>     support at least one of H.264 and VP8
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: Acceptable.
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them: Will cause more problems with interop with
>         other environments than plain H.264.
>
> 5.
>
>     All entities MUST support at least one of H.264 and VP8
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them: Does not encourage interoperability sufficiently.
>
> 6.
>
>     All entities MUST support H.261
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them: H.261 has no suitable formats for modern cameras.
>
> 7.
>
>     There is no MTI video codec
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them:
>         Does not encourage interoperability sufficiently. Acceptable
>         if MTI is agreed by another powerful organization.
>
> 8.
>
>     All entities MUST support H.261 and all entities MUST support at
>     least one of H.264 and VP8
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them: H.261 has no suitable formats for modern cameras.
>
> 9.
>
>     All entities MUST support Theora
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them: Not sufficiently wide spread before to be of
>         interest.
>
>10.
>
>     All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264, H.261}
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them: Complex construction. H.261 is not sufficient.
>
>11.
>
>     All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264, H.263}
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: Acceptable
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them: Will cause risk for transcoding to achieve
>         interop with other environments.
>
>12.
>
>     All entities MUST support decoding using both H.264 and VP8, and
>     MUST support encoding using at least one of H.264 or VP8
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them: Asymmetric support have interoperability risks
>
>13.
>
>     All entities MUST support H.263
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: Acceptable
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them: Quite good, but sad to not agree on latest
>         generation.
>
>14.
>
>     All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264, Theora}
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them: Theora is too little implemented to be of
>         interest.
>
>15.
>
>     All entities MUST support decoding using Theora.
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them: Theora is too little implemented
>
>16.
>
>     All entities MUST support Motion JPEG
>
>     1.
>
>         Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: No
>
>     2.
>
>         Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
>         summarize them: MJPEG is too bandwidth hungry
>
>
>
/Gunnar
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb