IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Nokia mincing)

Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org> Sat, 21 December 2013 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <stewe@stewe.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3332E1ADFE5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 10:01:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Bc3KD4r54C6 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 10:01:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2lp0207.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.207]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D456C1ADFE2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 10:01:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from CO1PR07MB363.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.141.75.22) by CO1PR07MB362.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.141.75.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.842.7; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 18:00:54 +0000
Received: from CO1PR07MB363.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.3.85]) by CO1PR07MB363.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.3.85]) with mapi id 15.00.0842.003; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 18:00:54 +0000
From: Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org>
To: Monty Montgomery <xiphmont@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Nokia mincing)
Thread-Index: AQHO/mMoQBxNvAqZSECUX4p45sPWNJpeZwOAgACImgD//3qoAA==
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 18:00:52 +0000
Message-ID: <CEDB173D.3E29D%stewe@stewe.org>
In-Reply-To: <CACrD=+8dMmjYWwQxw=8f97KA7sYOUCd1QrEtQMvdFqDPk7Ts6A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [50.174.124.99]
x-forefront-prvs: 0067A8BA2A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009001)(479174003)(377454003)(51704005)(164054003)(24454002)(189002)(199002)(19580395003)(81816001)(80976001)(85852003)(51856001)(80022001)(83072002)(66066001)(65816001)(81686001)(19580405001)(83322001)(56776001)(54316002)(63696002)(77096001)(46102001)(76796001)(59766001)(77982001)(79102001)(76176001)(36756003)(74876001)(74706001)(87266001)(2656002)(47736001)(81342001)(76786001)(81542001)(87936001)(56816005)(54356001)(31966008)(53806001)(90146001)(74366001)(47446002)(74502001)(74662001)(1411001)(76482001)(4396001)(50986001)(47976001)(49866001)(85306002)(69226001)(42262001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:CO1PR07MB362; H:CO1PR07MB363.namprd07.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:50.174.124.99; FPR:; RD:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <3AB59DACE131D14A83A94A0FF175413A@namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: stewe.org
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Counting NOs (Re: Straw Poll on Nokia mincing)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 18:01:03 -0000

Please point me to that consensus call.
Thanks,
Stephan


On 12/21/13, 9:58 AM, "Monty Montgomery" <xiphmont@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>Opus had several of these.
>>
>> Nonsense.  Really, people, try to do a minimum of homework before
>> commenting.
>
>Opus had a number of IPR declarations against it determined by
>consensus to be completely spurious.  I read nothing incorrect in
>Jack's comment.
>
>Too much of this discussion has become willfully obtuse.
>
>Monty

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email