Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives

Frode Kileng <frodek@tele.no> Fri, 10 January 2014 17:49 UTC

Return-Path: <frodek@tele.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2BF1AE14E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:49:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EWbpp1I-BQHX for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:49:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gorgon.tele.no (gorgon.tele.no [193.156.17.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E3091AE11D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:49:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gorgon.tele.no ([193.156.17.70] helo=[IPv6:::1]) by gorgon.tele.no with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <frodek@tele.no>) id 1W1gty-0007Qx-0q for rtcweb@ietf.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 19:33:50 +0100
Message-ID: <52D0325E.5080305@tele.no>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:48:14 +0100
From: Frode Kileng <frodek@tele.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CA+9kkMBSpDLJBBbPxgyMUi+bi3aw3D8zpSXcAvQ4koi115QqBg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBSpDLJBBbPxgyMUi+bi3aw3D8zpSXcAvQ4koi115QqBg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020607000800070309020803"
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:49:28 -0000

 1.

    All entities MUST support H.264

     1.

        Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *Acceptable*

     2.

        Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
        summarize them:

 2.

    All entities MUST support VP8

     1.

        Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *Acceptable*

     2.

        Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
        summarize them:

 3.

    All entities MUST support both H.264 and VP8

     1.

        Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *Acceptable*

     2.

        Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
        summarize them:

 4.

    Browsers MUST support both H.264 and VP8, other entities MUST
    support at least one of H.264 and VP8

     1.

        Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *Acceptable*

     2.

        Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
        summarize them:

 5.

    All entities MUST support at least one of H.264 and VP8

     1.

        Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *Yes*

     2.

        Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
        summarize them:

 6.

    All entities MUST support H.261

     1.

        Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *Acceptable*

     2.

        Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
        summarize them:

 7.

    There is no MTI video codec

     1.

        Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *Yes*

     2.

        Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
        summarize them:

 8.

    All entities MUST support H.261 and all entities MUST support at
    least one of H.264 and VP8

     1.

        Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *Acceptable*

     2.

        Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
        summarize them:

 9.

    All entities MUST support Theora

     1.

        Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *No*

     2.

        Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
        summarize them: *If an old fallback is to be selected, H261 is
        the safest option*

10.

    All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264, H.261}

     1.

        Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *Acceptable**
        *

        **
     2. **

        Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
        summarize them:

11.

    All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264, H.263}

     1.

        Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *No*

     2.

        Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
        summarize them:

12.

    All entities MUST support decoding using both H.264 and VP8, and
    MUST support encoding using at least one of H.264 or VP8

     1.

        Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *Acceptable*

     2.

        Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
        summarize them:

13.

    All entities MUST support H.263

     1.

        Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *No*

     2.

        Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
        summarize them: *H.264 is a better option if non-royalty free
        codec to be selected*

14.

    All entities MUST implement at least two of {VP8, H.264, Theora}

     1.

        Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *No*

     2.

        Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
        summarize them:

15.

    All entities MUST support decoding using Theora.

     1.

        Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *No*

     2.

        Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
        summarize them:

16.

    All entities MUST support Motion JPEG

     1.

        Are you in favor of this option [Yes/No/Acceptable]: *Acceptable*

     2.

        Do you have any objections to this option, if so please
        summarize them:


PS: IMHO "SHOULD support H264 and VP8" seems for me as the only 
potential option able to achieve consensus...

frodek