IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives

cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> Wed, 11 December 2013 03:51 UTC

Return-Path: <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2A91AE14E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:51:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b6yDap0zys0j for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:51:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-f173.google.com (mail-ig0-f173.google.com [209.85.213.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78C61AE140 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:51:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f173.google.com with SMTP id uq10so3142661igb.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:51:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lj32KTL+ZnSiP7wMmG3eSb0T5VgRVCEWyey0Xh9r4Bg=; b=YSYwlczJMyqtd640/MF40FiUv/AcR6sSujpwh3ZC5E952QLoQDxQH39h/10prkpuMK +tLgZW3YIhaFdYVbqZ8kaULVYHUhKOzxFE0oHYPIVqWwUF9viqZ7ksQjUmWDagX3DP/4 U/JAznLf7Fn0B2wEqO5QTQ76vG/m3ji/qYo5B33D4+pUN1RY6s471O+LeIsFE/xGwP+J MiBXIHXAf6Obzkm84M6f1vzS5a0NV353EGUcXlGsr2tlDs07FPuOZC5i+r3fA0SA5bax 0ldOAC/uKmd3pADcaIuAEwAR7HM/Mc1J77HQS280i8IOPRxccZMd2mlAXagB/oPyYDJU lklg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnCjjdaMo4qJNoLCT7V1iErq8DqqtJPDAWNWGFmQhvLU62gN5gSbidvuTdX7IT2V1BfWp91
X-Received: by 10.50.43.134 with SMTP id w6mr1059801igl.20.1386733866940; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:51:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (206-248-171-209.dsl.teksavvy.com. [206.248.171.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jk5sm6997421igb.0.2013.12.10.19.51.05 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:51:05 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52A7E115.2090806@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 22:50:45 -0500
From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBSpDLJBBbPxgyMUi+bi3aw3D8zpSXcAvQ4koi115QqBg@mail.gmail.com> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A48441927F3A@TK5EX14MBXC295.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <52A6D092.3090701@ericsson.com> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484419289C7@TK5EX14MBXC295.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <52A7A255.6050409@nostrum.com> <CABkgnnUZvKc5TF6anEJU=2RWUX1s2HpCqkLFUk1t0=ziUxE0dA@mail.gmail.com> <52A7B93F.2040409@bbs.darktech.org> <CABkgnnW1bHRS8uoZ4Gr5xFOjisXoGFiZGeBZzzAU3i_--QuwLA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnW1bHRS8uoZ4Gr5xFOjisXoGFiZGeBZzzAU3i_--QuwLA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 03:51:15 -0000

On 10/12/2013 10:48 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 10 December 2013 17:00, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote:
>> Anyway, I'll ask you the same question as I've asked Matthew: what is your
>> counter-proposal?
> What part of "waste of time" are you having trouble understanding?

So you're advocating settling on "No MTI"?

Gili

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email