IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives

cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> Wed, 11 December 2013 01:01 UTC

Return-Path: <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A1041ADFDD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:01:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TOwtSfx5xTMR for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:01:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f170.google.com (mail-ie0-f170.google.com [209.85.223.170]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892DC1ADFAD for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:01:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id qd12so10040501ieb.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:01:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=meC77WnA9IVgQ5uh6IodKsgXDxpkzfjpeK1ELw4C7XE=; b=dl9Gkz4qW8o+AVSkuklJJ3pKT0ykhEu9cBqBZVrCCFU/3F0/f6yt0qyHA9Q7fFEuX9 bnX3y+YRBcDbS6kqSz9+S/KgdtS5EthuWJyIEVMF2MeEMmm40dHVPUOt7kancD9tm6K7 wOoW73LVaOjsSS/NVR8Z+lOfZRlTdhrtIpijjmX7cPX6uXS3k9VLJDKsoPH2RCtaR33m +/LXlovxl3+BSD/Zx9782gYt4ZqeaIBOMEYaAtQCw0rC1qw3EAMZz9B5foWbrynEsaTe kuZOd/joR7F6rUj9UK1g/5rs0qfn83qQ0cH3w6qcFv2G8MBLhhEhp/GQLWBIcNOC2yvb SAqA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkLNAR0sgzp+/BIhpIV2f5qm+NYXvZ0aAXWmsZIngUOFhtjmx9SY3RVaXHwqQimOXcN8BX+
X-Received: by 10.42.24.138 with SMTP id w10mr19070210icb.22.1386723667622; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:01:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (206-248-171-209.dsl.teksavvy.com. [206.248.171.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id lp9sm6251111igb.2.2013.12.10.17.01.06 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:01:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52A7B93F.2040409@bbs.darktech.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 20:00:47 -0500
From: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CA+9kkMBSpDLJBBbPxgyMUi+bi3aw3D8zpSXcAvQ4koi115QqBg@mail.gmail.com> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A48441927F3A@TK5EX14MBXC295.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <52A6D092.3090701@ericsson.com> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484419289C7@TK5EX14MBXC295.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <52A7A255.6050409@nostrum.com> <CABkgnnUZvKc5TF6anEJU=2RWUX1s2HpCqkLFUk1t0=ziUxE0dA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUZvKc5TF6anEJU=2RWUX1s2HpCqkLFUk1t0=ziUxE0dA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 01:01:16 -0000

On 10/12/2013 7:01 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 10 December 2013 15:23, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
>> Then light a candle.
> I continue to do this, but still find myself agreeing with Matthew.

Methinks we are going to end up with two competing WebRTC specifications...

We have hundreds of participants on this list and everyone thinks they 
know better. The only way we're going to reach any sort of consensus is 
if people start compromising. I mention this because I noticed that some 
people have responded to the straw poll with one "Yes", a bunch of "No"s 
and not a single "Acceptable".

Anyway, I'll ask you the same question as I've asked Matthew: what is 
your counter-proposal?

Gili

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email