IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Tue, 04 October 2022 23:15 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9257C1524B5 for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 16:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.605
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4MREQJ5PcDMI for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 16:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2ABEC14F736 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 16:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E345C00C5; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 19:15:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Oct 2022 19:15:20 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1664925320; x= 1665011720; bh=986OUuBp8FK9H8KRPrT51oNPr3lsIWDwW19JvjmTfGY=; b=A kFUfIewXWiuIWljCEFFdnIOJo5be5rWmVWnA4VlgwrGFmS33RpSnE/v7NB953Ytk Lp3TWHenQ3BneakN7zalFiGpbNGmaE95YGj8o5K5FoK/XsyaWZMKEDDrxqx4KjKR vYnxHVEbuxsG3IKmFj6R+9yYKBcsVE7N7c+8Gp7kWYBGYL5EotW8sxm4bTc9Ozih o+7XF6OOefKM5OnPQ/3jrzMbsQyOpEdYi5PsA9uymd1Ri/O4Y7bDVQLxA+T78HBD lvcL/D/PFFJV5MsLSKB4zT4NWnfrMJllhTUirWZlUjv8JyBx3NIgNIbUlBAWyexg NNcOb6MAH1WfI8Uscsshw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:hr48Y-gBnYev_9ilkEDIl0K6S6AQkOU_UUEnlz8hqN-fCieOe8qqmw> <xme:hr48Y_BbZgd_MvKsISUthZx3YBotwcZ4nEsRrhmB-hUhsAMeRL8WFxf3_poSfur1n zxXBvYsaN-OSQ>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:hr48Y2Edz_UALB9wfipUpzOgh2f5DEFhjfPnfXBKVYDQuVCla2tT8eFv2zpF2wFICcLjYu4WsLLBr4DnurwQl09FfR-meAIwGKi1M7u220HafrWNMEvzUw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeeivddgudelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfevfhfhjggtgfesth ekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvihhthhcuofhoohhrvgcuoehmohhorhgvsehnvght fihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepuedvheehte efudeujedtleduiefgvefggfduveevkeduvdehveevgeekffdvjedvnecuvehluhhsthgv rhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifoh hrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:hr48Y3QU5DVp_cE2F8pmAEiehXf-5i2o2rlN8h6bo4X1B6xOi3eO-Q> <xmx:hr48Y7yxsIvFQZLOFxYhImiCHYwa68wNS8qBqkh8_nVwRkvZCSUZSw> <xmx:hr48Y14xIZzNuVsT8hk8-uWWvqCsQ3BuFGbiWBh0FtZuT7Wux3r_uw> <xmx:iL48Y8scwFBkJHTv9UkxVVHqqdOPzF_T1tgQHDWkdvuS--xX-DvGaA>
Feedback-ID: i5d8c41f0:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 19:15:17 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <46e9b2e4-ec37-1e61-0e02-e2a38975f7d1@network-heretics.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 19:15:17 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: last-call@ietf.org
References: <CFE25E25-D131-468E-9923-80350D6216F3@ietf.org> <DF06E9B6-CCCD-4A90-8E56-DC6C7297D642@apple.com> <1916ee1b-33bc-6180-f4e5-87446c962fc4@kit.edu> <6be2b10d-fd5c-06d7-3a61-9fc0b5ed7259@network-heretics.com> <CAL9Qcx4=nO2S+mmwzmfbO5UjrFZ1EAi7FV3mrb0m9eo3w5HSWw@mail.gmail.com> <a6400ec2-2c7f-e6c6-5150-b0da68be5c0f@network-heretics.com> <CAPt1N1kF9xL8Jn=4v9iCOxS3HTKvDr64D5=iRsxfZBMRHdqCMw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1kF9xL8Jn=4v9iCOxS3HTKvDr64D5=iRsxfZBMRHdqCMw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/R2Dxa8uPczAj1g1IF0rXDuKnh3s>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 23:15:26 -0000

On 10/4/22 19:01, Ted Lemon wrote:

> I think there is no point in continuing to engage in discussion here. 
> It’s pretty clear what the consensus is. Its pretty clear that Keith 
> will reply to each message here. Keith is one person. I expect that 
> the IESG will count his hundred messages as a single objection, not a 
> hundred. I appreciate that he wants to participate in this decision, 
> and he has a right to do so. But we don’t need to argue with him—the 
> IESG knows how to evaluate consensus, and our continued engagement 
> should not affect this process.

Deciding whether to abuse someone should not be a consensus process.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email