Re: [Last-Call] OT: change BCP 83 [Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins]

[Richard Barnes <[e-mail]>]

On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 2:49 AM Leif Johansson <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
> >
> > 2 okt. 2022 kl. 20:13 skrev Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>:
> >
> > 
> > On this aspect...
> >
> >> On 02/10/2022 10:12, Adam Roach wrote:
> >> Oh, definitely. I could name a few additional episodes from my own
> recollection, but those aren't really what I'm referencing in my previous
> message. What I'm seeing -- and this is admittedly subjective because I
> have neither the time nor energy to quantify it -- is an increase in
> /frequency/ of such events, and an increase in the number of specific
> individuals who choose to participate in such a fashion as a matter of
> course, rather than simply when passions run high. To be clear, it's not
> good in either case; but it's the /routine/ toxicity that makes working
> here such a uniquely unpleasant experience nowadays.
> >
> > I wonder if there's any less subjective metric that could be
> > applied to mailing list archives?
> >
> > Reason to ask: I don't share Adam's perception that toxic
> > posts on IETF lists are more frequent these days - if I had
> > to guess I'd say those, and other rudenesses, are notably
> > less frequent compared to a decade or two ago.
> >
> > I wonder if there's a correlation between such perceptions
> > and the extent to which people partake in the usual online
> > social networks that are reputedly quite toxic? I don't have
> > accounts on any of those myself but wouldn't be surprised if
> > perceptions of email traffic were affected by postings by the
> > same folk, or different folk on similar topics, seen in other
> > fora.
>
> I agree.
>

To the degree that's the case (which I'm not sure of), it shouldn't be read
as exculpatory of the IETF list.  It wouldn't be surprising if it were due
to being more aware of "leading indicators of toxicity" based on having
seen them elsewhere.  For example, when someone denies that racism exists
(e.g., [1]), it's often not because this is their sincerely held belief,
but because challenges to racism are predicated on its existence, and the
speaker wishes these challenges would stop.

--RLB

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/pl2lVqhtF4Z-0YuTjhCOmdyi1qE/