Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 24 July 2020 19:15 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B1C3A091C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jyehgw-hPkIx for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A5AE3A095F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:15:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.42.100] (p5089ae91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.174.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BCzRh4JrXzyPN; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 21:15:12 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Subject: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <203B4321-AC6A-4FBE-9EED-B192D7D2E3C5@strayalpha.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 21:15:11 +0200
Cc: IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 617310911.246069-e14a2b847d1546e9ff0864162acfaf87
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7641A89B-C38B-465D-93C3-B160ED5AA4CA@tzi.org>
References: <2c018854-bfc1-e014-6e5d-2ed799a6a602@gmail.com> <A73CC96D-7819-4CE6-A061-46003D45391A@strayalpha.com> <16bcab50-0b00-97dc-8b51-7b444ea45cea@gmail.com> <696817F8-70E2-44CC-87E5-26428F60B1C7@strayalpha.com> <203B4321-AC6A-4FBE-9EED-B192D7D2E3C5@strayalpha.com>
To: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/1VO6NBw7twzMrZbR-TgLdsuqfiE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:15:22 -0000

On 2020-07-24, at 20:57, Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> wrote:
> 
> - *I* plan on keeping a list of my own of terms to avoid

Can you put it in a place where we can find it for reference?

We don’t need consensus on these lists, but we do need to be reminded.

Grüße, Carsten