IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Sun, 09 August 2020 19:23 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1189E3A0CDA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 12:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.319
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.319 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u5twtoQLC_yr for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 12:23:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-4.web-hosting.com (server217-4.web-hosting.com [198.54.116.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A4413A0CF4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 12:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=9z++jbYqSE19cD8ympEvp4mLiX9yoffeccPh8O0F6Dk=; b=tYQqBJo20kXQgSUI/eYD1Ez/SS 62veV6H/fcBPDdDlw5EX3Fcoaw5BvXe4RINqBcMZ3Bx4tCZ/WV9SeEZ3W/NmNsapx2V7Gb7emOyvL b3E/mkhw759WqiST2I+n9CaIvefi7m515KRSOS+7Ye/qJHFhil6DWoJFTR0yewQEyzVKzGWqIbc0c 2VFrgWPgQ62n9La5+bXupIfyJp2BJV9+8oNrNztYUcTqztliuaaNC+7NJCWpeSPkoNJ8lu2hcoiEQ VfiHfbqhz1xeak+iA+cwmpB/aSx1PXPc/xdm5+lm9ayL4SjvZdrFF3bfQ2ojIiLTxQvjdyYd5Gil6 +wFNde5w==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:55087 helo=[192.168.1.5]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1k4qun-004GfZ-U1; Sun, 09 Aug 2020 15:23:34 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200809175214.GA3100@localhost>
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2020 12:23:29 -0700
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Lloyd Wood <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <DEC952F4-379C-4C97-8772-DA6C556A3AF1@strayalpha.com>
References: <20200809175214.GA3100@localhost>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17G68)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/z83EsVK8nmXml6W-Xpjt69WwpKg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2020 19:23:38 -0000


> On Aug 9, 2020, at 10:54 AM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:
> 
>  Really, asserting that "master secret"
> is problematic is simply credibility-destroying.

Besides your concern, how does one secret actively control another? 

Or is it just that there is one root key from which others are derived?

Ie why even bother defending a term that’s inaccurate to start?

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email