IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Mon, 27 July 2020 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3BB3A101C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 10:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.989
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.989 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL=0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gzZRlXp8cDuT for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 10:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 94A623A0C08 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 10:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 81403 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2020 17:42:06 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 27 Jul 2020 17:42:06 -0000
Subject: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <45882975-e4d1-045f-2556-d8defee22c91@lounge.org> <1BE15CF8-ECA3-48E7-BCEF-145EADF6D2EC@nohats.ca> <E1BD1EF8-E2A2-4057-86BB-AA080B506146@cisco.com> <e2e8fb86-2428-5bdc-3024-7e5970277847@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <ec572a66-f458-c3a0-e5f3-011ccbb8e9d6@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 03:00:15 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e2e8fb86-2428-5bdc-3024-7e5970277847@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_Iha_H1S8mYQlIRkEesr53w8aqU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:59:59 -0000

Unless you think discriminating people of black skin
is bad but discriminating people of dark skin is OK,
you might (though wrongly) think rfc8274 had been
problematic stating:

    The Internet of Things (IoT) malware test exchanged information that
    described a bad IP address of IoT malware and its scanned ports.
    This example information is extracted from alert messages of a
    darknet monitoring system referred to in [RFC8134].
    ^^^^

						Masataka Ohta

PS

May the light side force be with you.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email