Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Fri, 07 August 2020 16:40 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5023A0BF9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 09:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GMFN1fiXXSVC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 09:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83E4C3A0BF4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 09:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122331.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 077GYdUQ029261; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 17:40:20 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=voUSavT8H6I6XWli+VOFpKT2LL5gWVjNlIGF/ZD/E5M=; b=YFhncr7tR7Mb6WV8wtIeyHgz/41A0hygMjXYVoo9Qeuof0sHzZb41qY0XWgcL/Vs98lU Ml4Z/yF2dTWnnBwsT3PpwHYlNq7j3JzNF4CoP9oI2e+guKFwwecmF++feO7k+K6e+4AK 5n3Ai2Oevtkp7Y8MlSuMCq9xaRf/TU7aCy4i3wXfg2hoLrbHAoP3RrPzQ7sYZX/mR4sn +KysD0g/VtqE+woy+wA7ctdU3yFDa9nWwHoel4pcO01IqLQql2W6Fb0PeRGfYtqDhdbh e//HaNHp30aBE1A0RdPWCPWHbRfDAdcHtqcZ+YPTY1yKlc7x/ZPPwSH5+5ws67/azzsd Yw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint4 (a72-247-45-32.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.32] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32n6yf0h8c-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 07 Aug 2020 17:40:20 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 077Gad6B027937; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 12:40:19 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.118]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com with ESMTP id 32rtbucekm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 07 Aug 2020 12:40:19 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.119) by ustx2ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.124) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 09:40:19 -0700
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 11:40:18 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
CC: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
Thread-Topic: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
Thread-Index: AdZlXxvLaaeLVQ7CGUSWpNRf7XP2fgDFwBAAAAMBpYABCvciAAAQel+A///HlQCAAF6QgP//vaeA
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 16:40:18 +0000
Message-ID: <B0CC9129-EE98-40CB-9DDD-D3E2A8507934@akamai.com>
References: <5692e18e-afbb-9294-1074-3b81dafe8803@network-heretics.com> <59C4CA26-A1EB-4CF4-B973-BC2BBF53A094@gmail.com> <CAL02cgTZt-9+QWPT1aWXcOgpEwuNV2uHnVi5dGm7V5y_8_U1SQ@mail.gmail.com> <0cceb0f2-b5fe-a194-7ce8-68cc537f9cd1@lounge.org> <CAL02cgTV-cfTPO2wrKz0H2E=FLhagu-qs7fwx6jXeJDH-2cSHA@mail.gmail.com> <C4A6E144-1F1E-4568-8EFC-9FD62E69F50A@akamai.com> <e0070427-9995-4a96-0f40-24603e823f09@lounge.org>
In-Reply-To: <e0070427-9995-4a96-0f40-24603e823f09@lounge.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.39.20071300
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.116.44]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B0CC9129EE9840CB9DDDD3E2A8507934akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-08-07_15:2020-08-06, 2020-08-07 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=575 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2008070116
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-08-07_15:2020-08-06, 2020-08-07 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=542 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2008070116
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/jw4EVs53vXVx_1nVw0ijPt-fcOA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 16:40:23 -0000

> Referring to one's policy preferences as "progress" and that anyone opposed
must therefore resist "progress" is a popular but lame rhetorical device.
There is no arc of history bending anywhere. We're all just sitting on this
rock flying through space trying to get along. Please give me the benefit
of the doubt that I want things to be better and I want progress just like
you do, we just disagree on how to get there.

You are right and I should have used a more neutral world like “change.”

I apologize.