Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 28 July 2020 19:23 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB6F3A0BA3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZXaJn8YPFCmK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:23:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80FB73A0BA1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:23:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.195.251]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 06SJN8gY006367 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1595964201; x=1596050601; i=@elandsys.com; bh=vPMQzpaq5KzrwkJt6EJjdkNyFznp4CpwR3eA2jgsyLw=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=gL5S35bEvjyh+dj7YugnWY3inHKe7r9M0De5Nr1cqGrfjSHSBLf5oft8UJjzUWgbA xBQSCnIe62/Pk+5cNq06xU9LXe+3IhaX22jt3PJUF5bhBxqMZdfzZhlTZMFGme9gis xz2ZdwRCluGlwM1J1na3kX0oQjn3aXf8P8Bn5PTw=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200728115847.0be7d860@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:22:53 -0700
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
Cc: lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1C8DCC39-78FC-40AE-BCAB-17615F99787D@akamai.com>
References: <159552214576.23902.6025318815034036362@ietfa.amsl.com> <1cfa41c4-2877-2462-e5cc-325e67056d00@lounge.org> <2d8a103d-61b9-5ba0-c77f-d6b730eb982a@joelhalpern.com> <7ec1f6fe-8cb8-341e-ca07-b411a0a64795@lounge.org> <43EC74C0-589E-43DA-9F84-73D7B9F218CE@akamai.com> <526464f6-b82a-688b-cfaf-5a7e28ae18b0@lounge.org> <E16E1747-984B-4530-A9FD-7B59DA6F49E5@akamai.com> <1ae2ff5e-09e9-d230-a96b-763d4290d5e2@lounge.org> <972E831C-265A-4297-BAE3-7F167946FC78@akamai.com> <d13a2085-172a-e92c-6b12-c9d61ed384b5@lounge.org> <D5CC0F87-FF6A-4824-B930-A43875C2FF1E@akamai.com> <d7604baf-7caf-85d3-21af-b765295951f1@lounge.org> <E9923B2A-7A94-4EA1-9890-16801D82285D@akamai.com> <19456FE4-8781-4F4E-943B-9A430080A0E8@gmail.com> <CABmDk8=HBbOnEMprWfi7u4gtCbS1u-HW2watN48-SVG+9AtdAQ@mail.gmail.com> <2075838754.11970423.1595891262683@mail.yahoo.com> <76D06CB1-6A36-4FA1-972B-02E2CBE6FB41@gmail.com> <1390423269.12257387.1595931939454@mail.yahoo.com> <315DB65A-EDB9-4605-8CAB-DC80D76FADAC@akamai.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200728091207.10165f08@elandnews.com> <1C8DCC39-78FC-40AE-BCAB-17615F99787D@akamai.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ncyNuS-3ZpFQqn6jwVW97tfiIy8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:23:32 -0000

Hi Rich,
At 11:56 AM 28-07-2020, Salz, Rich wrote:
>Let's compare the two.

On reading the two opinion I could not reach any conclusion.

>One person, with no knowledge of the context or authors?

The person does not know the authors.  The persons and the authors 
(of the messages) are from the same country.  I provided information 
about the context.

>Do you think I am condescending?

I don't think so.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy