Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Mon, 27 July 2020 05:56 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F263A16EF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 22:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24=1.049, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tB-bi9mE6xMc for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 22:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [IPv6:2001:67c:27e4::14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53B123A16EB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 22:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2800:810:464:1f7:4ccc:6def:a83b:96ef] (unknown [IPv6:2800:810:464:1f7:4ccc:6def:a83b:96ef]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A4E7280CF6; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 05:55:32 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
Cc: "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <20200725211141.GK43465@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <7C08DF59-1CD1-4749-829A-603B4C228177@strayalpha.com> <20200725222524.GN43465@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <a7600801-1fff-1c43-5852-d3c4e8892be5@si6networks.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 13:05:28 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200725222524.GN43465@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/GXYlJQAgxO9aII-9p4vfnzsG9HY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 05:56:45 -0000

On 25/7/20 19:25, Toerless Eckert wrote:
[...]
> 
> And finally: if nobody reads RFCs, who the heck are we doing the more "polite"
> words for ? Just ourselves ?

Well, unfortunately, unless there's a more comprehensive strategy for 
inclusiveness, I believe that, unfortunately, you've made a valid point.

(Although I still think the effort is worthwhile).

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492