Re: RFC abbreviations list

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Sun, 26 July 2020 13:32 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC293A0EA6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 06:32:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ASZCI60hK38g for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 06:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C641C3A0EA4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 06:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06QDO2WW007781; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 14:32:01 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=l1KBLtQRhwvW0zTPG+2fZRc2SSkGqeXxLpLZrNP9ySk=; b=LMC2JQH4WBduv7u1U19M1a1hFDs0e7JKXqjGDPEms1MAGGWYIEfOXGI8Ul1O/Co6r/pD RZDbRTxOgd0xTFCuT5LtKXQb4cPGNUN6LQ8A7nQzUXD8xnVazjjqzxDz1IEqcM0+C6NY DkZ5g+u+RA49vEyzdPWB7aajcAz8SPZ2KaxXNTjY+7MD/p+lay2R7HWBAKEyNN4iPZ/R dnmrGbsLMRpxCF2lr+646lbVg+MqABBb4GsB48eZxMAmwC7AQcjap5i3qzZ2lAGvaL81 TQzAXMcE1fzcVSNao3cVvrKlwN0e1iWSlFRY04xeG7crLOv/OstU+6b6PkHZVUV/7CWG aA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint5 (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [184.51.33.60] (may be forged)) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 32gc0t2qku-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 26 Jul 2020 14:32:00 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06QDVwXw014850; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 06:31:59 -0700
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com with ESMTP id 32gjqapx3x-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 26 Jul 2020 06:31:59 -0700
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 09:31:58 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Sun, 26 Jul 2020 09:31:58 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
CC: IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: RFC abbreviations list
Thread-Topic: RFC abbreviations list
Thread-Index: AQHWYst5YKoreT32yEmZsBnq6Pk3DqkZH5KAgAC9HAA=
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 13:31:58 +0000
Message-ID: <EB22DBDC-D73D-4411-97E2-1457426EF190@akamai.com>
References: <35BE966B-63A2-438F-BD61-570E86ED2E1A@strayalpha.com> <297BF899-553D-44DB-AB56-04280F776F7A@employees.org> <6646575A-E6EA-4B4E-AC1B-F8B84B5A1203@strayalpha.com> <20200724225654.GB43465@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <8F6D2B44-1914-4B3B-9458-3F2BF2CFCA05@tzi.org> <20200725210457.GJ43465@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <9A6BE775-78B9-41C5-A3EE-A34C7D092CA0@tzi.org> <20200725221507.GL43465@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20200725221507.GL43465@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.38.20061401
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.114.69]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <22A241B3D2987B43A3CFC57893C9B724@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-07-26_04:2020-07-24, 2020-07-26 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=680 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2007260103
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-07-26_04:2020-07-24, 2020-07-26 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=649 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2007260104
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Z0QgAPDKZcUNfO6TJPTq4D7B3ao>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 13:32:08 -0000

>    If we can put the most important new standards into RFC abbreviation list
    even after i tell an AD twice, then i don't think we can deal with
    new technical terms in the organization any better.

I am way more optimistic.