IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org> Fri, 07 August 2020 05:55 UTC

Return-Path: <dharkins@lounge.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62CE33A0BA8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 22:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.949, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UtrlAysi9Qw1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 22:55:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.goatley.com (www.goatley.com [198.137.202.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 139E23A0B8F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 22:55:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from trixy.bergandi.net (cpe-76-176-14-122.san.res.rr.com [76.176.14.122]) by wwwlocal.goatley.com (PMDF V6.8 #2433) with ESMTP id <0QEO1PJK4J58Z0@wwwlocal.goatley.com> for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 00:55:56 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from Dans-MacBook-Pro.local ([69.12.173.8]) by trixy.bergandi.net (PMDF V6.7-x01 #2433) with ESMTPSA id <0QEO0037RJI5D9@trixy.bergandi.net> for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 23:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 69-12-173-8.static.dsltransport.net ([69.12.173.8] EXTERNAL) (EHLO Dans-MacBook-Pro.local) with TLS/SSL by trixy.bergandi.net ([10.0.42.18]) (PreciseMail V3.3); Thu, 06 Aug 2020 23:03:45 -0700
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 22:55:50 -0700
From: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>
Subject: Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
In-reply-to: <4b8733f5-4356-2018-8e08-87e7596258ae@network-heretics.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Message-id: <b94b2231-6fe0-cd8f-c527-e0377c8e4dff@lounge.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_Vb+Ro9S/0NR2pRgEhq+MdA)"
Content-language: en-US
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
X-PMAS-SPF: SPF check skipped for authenticated session (recv=trixy.bergandi.net, send-ip=69.12.173.8)
X-PMAS-External-Auth: 69-12-173-8.static.dsltransport.net [69.12.173.8] (EHLO Dans-MacBook-Pro.local)
References: <35BE966B-63A2-438F-BD61-570E86ED2E1A@strayalpha.com> <297BF899-553D-44DB-AB56-04280F776F7A@employees.org> <6646575A-E6EA-4B4E-AC1B-F8B84B5A1203@strayalpha.com> <20200724225654.GB43465@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <52BB048D-A4F1-4CEF-B93D-35195C96B7F0@strayalpha.com> <CAJU8_nVWn7Kyh8omLiQVK9Q5DM1uBL7Qs45pi0y9U0tftt-uyw@mail.gmail.com> <4b8733f5-4356-2018-8e08-87e7596258ae@network-heretics.com>
X-PMAS-Software: PreciseMail V3.3 [200806] (trixy.bergandi.net)
X-PMAS-Allowed: system rule (rule allow header:X-PMAS-External noexists)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wx4TQ4qQ-J1NuBDAJ7PHkYoA_A8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 05:56:00 -0000


On 7/30/20 7:47 PM, Keith Moore wrote:
> To me, part of what inclusion looks like is /respectful tolerance of 
> differing views //even though some of those views make some people 
> uncomfortable/.   I want to suggest that people being immediately 
> comfortable isn't an appropriate goal, because it always makes some 
> people uncomfortable that there are multiple valid perspectives on a 
> subject.  Instead, the community needs to cultivate a willingness to 
> be uncomfortable when it is done in the service of accommodating 
> different views and building rough consensus. 

   This is exactly right! Yes... +1!

   Dan.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email