Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 29 July 2020 00:40 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4754D3A0D37 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N3-sn8ickJk1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC583A0D2F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.190.157]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 06T0eSQJ028281 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1595983244; x=1596069644; i=@elandsys.com; bh=lzgR2XDsJmKuw3QdIoP6y930tH0V/AMs2mv9y/xJxz8=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=eh2oDf7C6YRYWIpsHEFvYoSV+pxcnLJ5HpLtaTvcpAANxEHMDO8M7//5oM8Qt5GvJ jKp0/2JhbX+HRrYrmMq7y7EjmjQOYpnoNxuk9lYyrnibYelMAuwwhl9tKR2yIA/0S5 E4xecswMEwXzZsbh7pPhFJMqyV3gepgUi99TYJX8=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200728152504.0c1b56e0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:38:24 -0700
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200728212507.GG3100@localhost>
References: <D5CC0F87-FF6A-4824-B930-A43875C2FF1E@akamai.com> <d7604baf-7caf-85d3-21af-b765295951f1@lounge.org> <E9923B2A-7A94-4EA1-9890-16801D82285D@akamai.com> <19456FE4-8781-4F4E-943B-9A430080A0E8@gmail.com> <CABmDk8=HBbOnEMprWfi7u4gtCbS1u-HW2watN48-SVG+9AtdAQ@mail.gmail.com> <2075838754.11970423.1595891262683@mail.yahoo.com> <76D06CB1-6A36-4FA1-972B-02E2CBE6FB41@gmail.com> <1390423269.12257387.1595931939454@mail.yahoo.com> <315DB65A-EDB9-4605-8CAB-DC80D76FADAC@akamai.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200728091207.10165f08@elandnews.com> <20200728212507.GG3100@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/yYGH6onNvAy9gJz7fEiWlguv81k>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 00:40:53 -0000

Hi Nico, Fernando,
At 02:25 PM 28-07-2020, Nico Williams wrote:
>In regards to "folks"?!

Yes.  Please see 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/kSG5GfCE5ozrD-mRiJ4lGu-E9zY/

>I'm from Argentina.  I spent 15 years in the NYC area.  I've since been
>living in Texas.  I use Texas-isms all the time to demonstrate comfort.
>
>Yes, I suppose I could use "y'all" and "folks" to talk-down-to, or sign
>"Cheers," (an Ozzie-ism?) as in "bleep off", and perhaps I have, but I
>also sign "Cheers," frequently out of habit, as a positive note.  Because:

The words which you mentioned above would likely be used by people 
who have some affinity with a geographical area.

There are a few English sentences (unrelated to what you wrote) which 
I regarded as friendly.  I have a different opinion nowadays.

>Well, context simply matters.  Much language is dual-use!  :)

Yes.

>Intent also matters.  Lack of intent to offend does not mean offense
>won't be received, and it does not mean that the first person shouldn't
>consider adapting their speech to avoid giving further offense when they
>learn of it, nor does it mean that the second person shouldn't learn to
>identify contexts that make the apparently-offensive speech not-quite-
>so.  Lack of intent certainly means we should be open to forgiveness.

Should previous complaints be taken into account?  Should the 
differences in culture be taken into account?

>Empathy requires we make an effort to assume good faith, and that we be
>open to learning and forgiving.

There is a message at 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/PJJ3GuNKOlcNrmu1ETZeTINFHwY/ 
If that is the principle which reflects reality, I doubt that anyone 
who falls outside it would be open to forgiveness.

At 02:57 PM 28-07-2020, Fernando Gont wrote:
>I guess much of this issue would be solved by applying Postel's Principle?

I don't think so as the principle was established for a different context.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy