Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Sun, 09 August 2020 23:19 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23AD13A0E67 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 16:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.049
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.049 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.949, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sZBiw9nJrd8D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 16:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 101893A0E66 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 16:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BPw6f5Xyzz6G9BB; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 16:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1597015194; bh=IfZt2SMws3ys6xPqIyF8DPkAy913VXGEwX4LmaQQGKg=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=cOyE83/hPIawxMQhRq0wWIqU6H1QjzR+GgLnm5k6hnmxVINKRp7VADy5EYvM/p8Lc n8pMZ572UUlNyIj01xZ2/Cxh1vda4AClVP0Hl36YQRq5yDAy24WxoCgoFNGSJfH1Z2 3u3LS61eCmatyzDZV7RWwQhe4F5AADnD8aZw74Rk=
X-Quarantine-ID: <THMN2tSiYokF>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at a2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.128.43] (209-255-163-147.ip.mcleodusa.net [209.255.163.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BPw6f1ZhDz6G8pj; Sun, 9 Aug 2020 16:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
To: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <ab2c95a9-3974-23da-e289-b84321f0d8b4@joelhalpern.com> <101BDE8C-A770-4B10-9C3C-400A80CFC7BB@strayalpha.com>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <da69692f-a663-1f46-8518-356dcf794d2d@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2020 19:19:52 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <101BDE8C-A770-4B10-9C3C-400A80CFC7BB@strayalpha.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/nszyjShtqTYZ4c-zAF-Bltl7-E4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2020 23:19:59 -0000

Granted.  In the long run, all language changes.

However, I expect some uses to change sooner than others.  And I am not 
asking that all uses change now.  But I do think we should change some 
of the uses, in our space.

Yours,
Joel

On 8/9/2020 6:37 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Aug 9, 2020, at 2:27 PM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
>>
>> While I do not know what others expect, I do not expect those usages to change.  Words have many meanings.
> 
> Angeits awaendednys*
> 
> Or don’t you still speak Old English?
> 
> Joe
> 
> *(meanings change)
>