IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Mon, 27 July 2020 16:22 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589A43A0FAC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:22:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.318
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.318 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W8iqooBTx6GN for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-4.web-hosting.com (server217-4.web-hosting.com [198.54.116.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD9043A0F78 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=FvenIUggD8NwKMQeY1jMyISUB3/BsPsGn6PtBds5JGc=; b=UrqDOQv5koux91VLKsM5aMWES Yf7fxAfq0/RuY+vleCL3bV58QBLizxT0isvZngZMwfjXXXAdzess47LEwsIGGnw2yxzdGnsFLv6sW cfYMwh3xC3dmrKIpwq4WrnxOUIuU1bhUie6NybemGB+Gx9B6esUWPeHdVo5HNqbOWAd8ALvScVFdc SoKRdIfRM0JkP8HMRJEx7v/eFLjIvSLU1/f4oN3zvJ/RVWFL9IU4MogPgV/6DkTKMtPkO1ePV2X4G +FvzGQO6xJDfuvi5/dQQuMW90Xwipg4tGVclN2BEFMi7AC8oDHUz4XWSUUYwloXBAO2krb9zEUfOb uNYqxqrYw==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:59475 helo=[192.168.1.14]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1k05tb-0010gm-KK; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 12:22:39 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C1B64026-62A0-43BB-B465-32D7F2A81D48"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Subject: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
From: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <D95592C0-504D-42D1-B414-B46DAB5FEDC5@akamai.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:22:34 -0700
Cc: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, Carrick Bartle <cbartle891=40icloud.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <E322F7B2-DCDB-4BD0-9450-1EAF5A41A655@strayalpha.com>
References: <CAL02cgRb1BBphPH+54fof8yBewbrHanySuVQV_tekWdTuzak8w@mail.gmail.com> <5761EB4D-9C47-4251-9D24-90EEDCB13DB2@strayalpha.com> <D95592C0-504D-42D1-B414-B46DAB5FEDC5@akamai.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Z_s0rnSXdTW1ZdW3tp4utMbYyAM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 16:22:42 -0000

IMO, it would be useful for those who care to post a list of what they consider eligible and/or comment on lists others have posted.

Same with process.

So far we’ve been speaking in hypotheticals of what might result; I’d like to see what people have in mind beyond what’s written.

Joe

> On Jul 27, 2020, at 9:16 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
> 
> I’m asking what actions are planned. Or has that been sidelined in favor of discussion?
>  
> The IESG posted their statement four days ago. Since then about 200 messages with this subject have been posted, about 60 people commented and the top five are:
>   29  "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com <mailto:rsalz@akamai.com>>
>   21  Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp <mailto:mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>>
>   19  Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de <mailto:tte@cs.fau.de>>
>   18  Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com <mailto:touch@strayalpha.com>>
>    9  Dan Harkins dharkins@lounge.org <mailto:dharkins@lounge.org>
>  
> More than half of all postings were people who posted one or two messages.
>  
> TL;DR:  Still early to plan actions I think.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email