IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Mon, 27 July 2020 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57203A1B41; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.32
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.32 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id muMdH4zWvS5p; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-4.web-hosting.com (server217-4.web-hosting.com [198.54.116.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 888F83A1A24; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=EQiQWRQjfXe6IUwol01wlqhpeOKT0CZ+wW5V+ClQn3g=; b=WCzeKhgUOqgc0OP/Kjsru05A0 mOekw7yBPW14GOyF5/NMHOK2Oxy5bAzqbIpNCskqGZ8bZReVMAJxPvzBpiHCWB1I2sXo2vcLpxefp E9J2aKWZxLW/RHpHFEV/j9a/Erg80H3PCiqHGtdwTvbI0ro8u+oPb7xhb6HmzlAOaDngAXBNK70Ny 21+cv6yV1W7Tt87mJj7/+6jyebeGcehEns0M+xygvlnOQ1wW6LMDSsI3WkOat3qmm6q0c2esE03kH Fq+zGAbVZntM4SGWuByR2RZX+ZNzEG/l/nb9LqoCviaWVUbQb60t36hZlwgqAsoe2NFlEDi5nBtl5 P6oj4/cDg==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:59656 helo=[192.168.1.14]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1k0626-001AOP-Il; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 12:31:26 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Subject: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language
From: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <2290022C-77F4-4979-93E5-44D9AF377A0C@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:31:21 -0700
Cc: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>, IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FE9E44D2-F928-43B9-851F-E9587B0E3BC2@strayalpha.com>
References: <159552214576.23902.6025318815034036362@ietfa.amsl.com> <dc32abdd-d361-a81b-a61d-4f4f69443e22@si6networks.com> <6E23B161-6CA0-40D1-A37A-6F0F79A90EB2@strayalpha.com> <cc5ee354-8307-a8ab-bfe0-522dc593d43d@acm.org> <EBDE082B-5663-47A1-820E-EBAEC75A36DC@tzi.org> <30F40837-55D3-4504-8310-AD387B156408@ietf.org> <E8744E54-084E-496F-9662-876E311FCEAD@strayalpha.com> <2290022C-77F4-4979-93E5-44D9AF377A0C@gmail.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/7ccGTylsbjlJfAvGjpPRJkBfwks>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 16:31:43 -0000

FWIW, for flip-flops, leader/follower works too.

> On Jul 27, 2020, at 5:35 AM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Joe
> 
> I see how that properly describes the relative authority of the two components.
> 
> I always prefer to use a h/w flip-flop to visualise the behaviour.
> 
> I am fine with moving to a new name provided we captures the actual behaviour.
> 
> Stewart
> 
>> On 26 Jul 2020, at 22:49, Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jul 26, 2020, at 2:32 PM, Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> A question I can’t resolve by Googling - has anyone attempted to create entirely new words to represent the concepts that master or slave have been used to represent?  e.g. a word that means "authoritative source of data that has no dependency on another source" and has no other meaning?
>> 
>> Why aren’t either primary or authoritative vs. copy/secondary/replica sufficient?
>> 
>> Joe
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email